Achieving Scale at the District Level: A Longitudinal Multiple Case Study of a Partnership Reform

被引:13
作者
Sanders, Mavis G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland Baltimore Cty, Dept Educ, Baltimore, MD 21250 USA
关键词
scaling up reform; systemic change; district leadership; reform implementation; education reform; school reform; family and community engagement in schools; COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT; SCHOOL-REFORM; EDUCATION REFORM; SUSTAINABILITY; FAMILY;
D O I
10.1177/0013161X11417432
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Purpose: Coburn's (2003) multidimensional conception of scale includes four interrelated dimensions-depth, sustainability, spread, and ownership-that provide a framework to understand scale at both the school and district levels. This study was conducted to understand how reform leaders in four districts implementing the National Network of Partnership Schools' (NNPS) framework for school, family, and community partnerships influenced progress along these four dimensions of scale. Research Methods: The study used a longitudinal qualitative case study approach. Four districts that had been members of NNPS for 5 years or longer and reported high levels of leadership for family and community engagement were selected for the study. Each district was studied for a period of 3 years. Interview, observation, and survey data were collected and analyzed. Findings: The study found that NNPS reform leaders influenced the case districts' progress on Coburn's dimensions of scale through a variety of facilitating practices and activities. In addition, the study found that positive relationships that the reform leaders developed with key actors within the districts and NNPS helped to explain variations in their effectiveness as facilitators of scale. Three factors-intent, knowledge and skills, and access-were found to affect the relationships forged by the focal leaders. Conclusions: The study's findings highlight the need for more targeted studies on relationship development and maintenance at different stages of reform implementation. They also underscore the need for greater focus on district leaders' deep understanding of reform principles and the scaling up process in order to promote more lasting school change.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 186
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Allison D., 1995, Effective school district leadership: Transforming politics into education, P33
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, School, family, and community partnerships: Your handbook for action
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, QUALITATIVE RES ED I
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Applied Social Research Methods Series
[5]   Looking back over a decade of whole-school reform: The experience of new American schools [J].
Berends, M ;
Bodilly, S ;
Kirby, SN .
PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 2002, 84 (02) :168-175
[6]  
Bodilly S., 2004, Expanding the reach of education reforms. perspectives from leaders in the scale-Up of educational interventions
[7]  
Bodilly S.J., 1999, Hard work for good schools: Facts, not fads, in Title I reform, P111
[8]  
Century J., 2004, NAT ASS RES SCI TEAC
[9]  
Century J.R., 2002, BENCHMARKS, V3, P1
[10]  
Coburn C.E., 2003, Educational Researcher, V32, P3, DOI [DOI 10.3102/0013189X032006003, 10.3102/0013189X032006003]