Pitfalls and sources of error in staging rectal cancer with endorectal US

被引:45
|
作者
Kruskal, JB [1 ]
Kane, RA [1 ]
Sentovich, SM [1 ]
Longmaid, HE [1 ]
机构
[1] DEACONESS HOSP,DEPT COLORECTAL SURG,BOSTON,MA 02215
关键词
neoplasms; staging; rectum; US; ultrasound; (US); artifact;
D O I
10.1148/radiographics.17.3.9153700
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Endorectal ultrasound (US) is an accurate technique for local staging of rectal cancer, Because the choice of surgery depends on the level of tumor invasion and lymph node involvement, the surgeon relies largely on endorectal US findings when planning treatment, However, staging inaccuracies can occur due to over- or underestimation of tumor depth, misinterpretation of lymph node involvement, and operator inexperience, Technical pitfalls in US of the rectal wall include proximity of the lesion to the anal verge, improper balloon inflation, a nonperpendicular imaging plane, shadowing artifacts due to air or stool, reverberation artifacts, refraction artifacts, and a transducer gain setting that is too high, Sources of error in tumor staging with endorectal US include interpretation differences, endosonologist bias, tumor location, tumor stenosis, peritumoral inflammation, postbiopsy and postsurgical changes, post irradiation changes, hemorrhage, and pedunculated or villous tumors. Node size and appearance are not reliable indicators of lymph node involvement, Awareness of these sources of error will improve the technical quality of endorectal US studies and allow more accurate tumor staging.
引用
收藏
页码:609 / 626
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Staging of rectal cancer after polypectomy: Usefulness of endorectal US
    Kruskal, JB
    Sentovich, SM
    RADIOLOGY, 1999, 211 (01) : 31 - 35
  • [2] Endorectal ultrasonography performance in staging rectal cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
    Panzironi, Giuseppe
    Guerrieri, Daniele
    De Cristofaro, Flaminia
    Bangrazi, Caterina
    Di Paola, Chiara
    Jafari, Leyla
    Fiore, Fabrizio
    Masoni, Luigi
    ANNALI ITALIANI DI CHIRURGIA, 2014, 85 (06) : 569 - 575
  • [3] The learning curve for endorectal ultrasonography in rectal cancer staging
    Li, Jimmy C. M.
    Liu, Shirley Y. W.
    Lo, Anthony W. I.
    Hon, Sophie S. F.
    Ng, Simon S. M.
    Lee, Janet F. Y.
    Leung, Ka Lau
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (12): : 3054 - 3059
  • [4] Rectal cancer: Evaluation of staging with endosonography
    Lindmark, GE
    Kraaz, WG
    Elvin, PAB
    Glimelius, BLG
    RADIOLOGY, 1997, 204 (02) : 533 - 538
  • [5] Endorectal sonography in rectal cancer staging and indication for local surgery
    Vyslouzil, K.
    Cwiertka, K.
    Zboril, P.
    Kucerova, L.
    Klementa, I.
    Stary, L.
    Skalicky, P.
    Duda, M.
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 54 (76) : 1102 - 1106
  • [6] Staging of rectal tumors with endorectal examination techniques: Demonstration of a possible pitfall
    Gossmann, A
    Heindel, W
    Ernst, S
    Lackner, K
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 1997, 167 (01): : 96 - 98
  • [7] Preoperative Radiological Staging of Rectal Cancer
    Kim, Min Ju
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 52 (05): : 509 - 517
  • [8] Endorectal MR imaging and ultrasonography of rectal tumours: Correlation with pathologic staging.
    Heindel, W
    Gossmann, A
    Ernst, S
    Schafer, H
    Kugel, H
    Krug, B
    Selzner, M
    Krahe, T
    Lackner, K
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 1998, 168 (06): : 573 - 579
  • [9] Limitations and pitfalls of transrectal ultrasonography for staging of rectal cancer
    Akasu, T
    Sugihara, K
    Moriya, Y
    Fujita, S
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1997, 40 (10) : S10 - S15
  • [10] Transvaginal sonography as an adjunct to endorectal sonography in the staging of rectal cancer in women
    Dhamanaskar, Kavita P.
    Thurston, Wendy
    Wilson, Stephanie R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 187 (01) : 90 - 98