Periods of weed interference in soybean under tillage and no-tillage

被引:38
|
作者
Nepomuceno, M. [1 ]
Alves, P. L. C. A. [1 ]
Dias, T. C. S.
Pavani, M. C. M. D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Paulista, FCAV, Dept Biol Aplicada Agropecuaria, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
关键词
competition; Glycine max; control periods;
D O I
10.1590/S0100-83582007000100005
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
This work aimed to determine the interference of weed communities in crop yield characteristics, under no-till and conventional till systems. The soybean cultivars used in these experiments were M-SOY - 6101 and CD 201 for conventional and no-till, respectively. The no-till system weed community reached its maximum value of 377 plants m(-2) 28 days after soybean emergence. Maximum dry matter accumulation was 365.7 g m(-2), 118 days after emergence, with the main plants being Alternanthera tenella, Cenchrus echinatus and Bidens pilosa. Under the conventional till system, maximum density was 161 plants m(-2), 18 DAE and 406.7g m(-2) of dry matter accumulation at 118 DAE, with the main plants being A. tenella, Senna obtusifolia and Panicum maximum. Accepting losses of 5% in soybean productivity, the CPPI values were estimated to range from 33 to 66 DAE for the no-till system and from 34-76 DAE for the conventional till system. Weed interference during the full crop cycle reduced, in average, 46 and 32% of productivity under the no- till and conventional till systems, respectively. No effects were observed on plant height, first pod insertion height, and number of pods per plant due to the presence of weed community.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 50
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparing Soybean Productivity, Soil Health, and Economic Viability Under No-Tillage and Conventional Tillage in the Lower Mississippi Delta
    Anapalli, Saseendran S.
    Partson, Mubvumba
    Pinnamaneni, Srinivasa R.
    Reddy, Krishna N.
    Corser, Jonathan K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2025, 2025 (01)
  • [42] Weed control in dry pea (Pisum sativum) under conventional and no-tillage systems
    Yenish, JP
    Eaton, NA
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 16 (01) : 88 - 95
  • [43] Barley, soybean and maize production using ridge tillage, no-tillage and conventional tillage in north-east Italy
    Borin, M
    Sartori, L
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 1995, 62 (04): : 229 - 236
  • [44] Weed management in watermelon crop in no-tillage and conventional systems
    da Silva, Marcio Gledson O.
    de Freitas, Francisco Claudio L.
    de Negreiros, Maria Zuleide
    de Mesquita, Helida C.
    de Santana, Fabiana Aline O.
    de Lima, Mayky Francley P.
    HORTICULTURA BRASILEIRA, 2013, 31 (03) : 494 - 499
  • [45] WEED-CONTROL IN SOYBEAN UNDER DIFFERENT CROPPING AND TILLAGE SYSTEMS
    SHAW, DR
    RAINERO, HP
    JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE, 1990, 3 (04): : 453 - 460
  • [46] TIMING OF WEED-CONTROL IN NO-TILLAGE WHEAT CROPS
    FORCELLA, F
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1986, 78 (03) : 523 - 526
  • [47] Conservation tillage, no-tillage and related technologies
    Derpsch, R
    CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE: ENVIRONMENT, FARMERS EXPERIENCES, INNOVATIONS, SOCIO-ECONOMY, POLICY, 2003, : 181 - 190
  • [48] THE PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF WEED-CONTROL FOR NO-TILLAGE SOYBEAN IN SOUTHERN BRAZIL USING THE BIPYRIDYL HERBICIDES
    WILES, TL
    HAYWARD, DM
    TROPICAL PEST MANAGEMENT, 1981, 27 (03): : 388 - 400
  • [49] Soil surface water evaporation under no-tillage and conventional tillage systems
    Dalmago, Genei Antonio
    Bergamaschi, Homero
    Menegassi Bianchi Krueger, Cleusa Adriane
    Bergonci, Joao Ito
    Comiran, Flavia
    Machado Heckler, Bruna Maria
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 2010, 45 (08) : 780 - 790
  • [50] Plot size in experiments with wheat irrigated under no-tillage and conventional tillage
    Neto, DH
    Sediyama, T
    de Souza, MA
    Cecon, PR
    Yamanaka, CH
    Sediyama, MAN
    Viana, AES
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 2004, 39 (06) : 517 - 524