Periods of weed interference in soybean under tillage and no-tillage

被引:38
|
作者
Nepomuceno, M. [1 ]
Alves, P. L. C. A. [1 ]
Dias, T. C. S.
Pavani, M. C. M. D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Paulista, FCAV, Dept Biol Aplicada Agropecuaria, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
关键词
competition; Glycine max; control periods;
D O I
10.1590/S0100-83582007000100005
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
This work aimed to determine the interference of weed communities in crop yield characteristics, under no-till and conventional till systems. The soybean cultivars used in these experiments were M-SOY - 6101 and CD 201 for conventional and no-till, respectively. The no-till system weed community reached its maximum value of 377 plants m(-2) 28 days after soybean emergence. Maximum dry matter accumulation was 365.7 g m(-2), 118 days after emergence, with the main plants being Alternanthera tenella, Cenchrus echinatus and Bidens pilosa. Under the conventional till system, maximum density was 161 plants m(-2), 18 DAE and 406.7g m(-2) of dry matter accumulation at 118 DAE, with the main plants being A. tenella, Senna obtusifolia and Panicum maximum. Accepting losses of 5% in soybean productivity, the CPPI values were estimated to range from 33 to 66 DAE for the no-till system and from 34-76 DAE for the conventional till system. Weed interference during the full crop cycle reduced, in average, 46 and 32% of productivity under the no- till and conventional till systems, respectively. No effects were observed on plant height, first pod insertion height, and number of pods per plant due to the presence of weed community.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 50
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Weed interference on nutrient accumulation in the leaves or cassava under no-tillage or conventional tillage
    Pompermaier Ramella, Joao Ricardo
    Barbosa, Jaqueline de Araujo
    Ferreira, Silvio Douglas
    Fey, Emerson
    da Costa, Neumarcio Vilanova
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 2020, 55
  • [2] NODULATION OF SOYBEAN UNDER NO-TILLAGE IN COMPARISON TO CONVENTIONAL TILLAGE
    VOSS, M
    SIDIRAS, N
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 1985, 20 (07) : 775 - 782
  • [3] Weed Control Using Conventional Tillage, Reduced Tillage, No-Tillage, and Cover Crops in Organic Soybean
    Weber, Jonas F.
    Kunz, Christoph
    Peteinatos, Gerassimos G.
    Zikeli, Sabine
    Gerhards, Roland
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2017, 7 (05):
  • [4] Straw Cover Formation and Weed Management in Soybean under No-Tillage System
    Nunes, A. S.
    Timossi, P. C.
    Pavani, M. C. M. O. D.
    Costa Alves, A. P. L.
    PLANTA DANINHA, 2010, 28 (04) : 727 - 733
  • [5] Growth analysis of soybean under no-tillage and conventional tillage systems
    Yusuf, RI
    Siemens, JC
    Bullock, DG
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1999, 91 (06) : 928 - 933
  • [6] Grass weed interference and nitrogen accumulation in no-tillage corn
    Hellwig, KB
    Johnson, WG
    Scharf, PC
    WEED SCIENCE, 2002, 50 (06) : 757 - 762
  • [7] Survival of pathogens on soybean debris under no-tillage and conventional tillage systems
    Almeida, AMR
    Saraiva, OF
    Farias, JRB
    Gaudencio, CA
    Torres, E
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 2001, 36 (10) : 1231 - 1238
  • [8] Weed Communities and their Interference in No-Tillage Bean Sown in the Spring Season
    Barroso, A. A. M.
    Alves, P. L. C. A.
    Yamauti, M. S.
    Nepomuceno, M. P.
    PLANTA DANINHA, 2012, 30 (02) : 279 - 286
  • [9] Water use Efficiency and Weed Interference in Melon Crop under Conventional and No-Tillage Systems
    Teofilo, T. M. S.
    Freitas, F. C. L.
    Medeiros, J. F.
    Fernandes, D.
    Grangeiro, L. C.
    Tomaz, H. V. Q.
    Rodrigues, A. P. M. S.
    PLANTA DANINHA, 2012, 30 (03) : 547 - 556
  • [10] Broadleaf weed control with sulfentrazone and flumioxazin in no-tillage soybean (Glycine max)
    Niekamp, JW
    Johnson, WG
    Smeda, RJ
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 13 (02) : 233 - 238