Recipes for Cost and Schedule Successes in Industrial Modular Projects: Qualitative Comparative Analysis

被引:58
作者
Choi, Jin Ouk [1 ]
O'Connor, James T. [2 ]
Kim, Tae Wan [1 ]
机构
[1] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Architecture & Civil Engn, Tat Chee Ave, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Civil Architectural & Environm Engn, Project Management, 1 Univ Stn C1752, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
Modularization; Critical success factors; Industrial projects; Cost performance; Schedule performance; Project planning and design; OFF-SITE PRODUCTION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001171
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Modularization is a well-established method that can improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the construction industry. However, the industry continues to struggle with its implementation, and not all executed modular projects have resulted in successful project performance. This study investigates the combinatorial effects of modularization critical success factors (CSF) on the cost and schedule performances of industrial modular projects and derives a conceptual model of cost and schedule successes using information from actual cases by applying crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis. The findings confirm that CSFs interactively and collectively affect modular industrial project performance. The most commonly involved CSFs for cost and schedule successes are timely design freeze, owner-furnished/long-lead equipment specification, vendor involvement, and management of execution risks. This work contributes to researchers and practitioners in the industrial sector to improve understanding of the recipes (i.e.,CSFs or combinations thereof) for successful modular project planning and execution, which will lead to improved modular project performance in the construction industry.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, PREF PREASS MOD OFFS
[2]   Framework for Aligning Project Management with Organizational Strategies [J].
Ansari, Ramin ;
Shakeri, Eghbal ;
Raddadi, Ali .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2015, 31 (04)
[3]   Conceptual model of partnering and alliancing [J].
Anvuur, Aaron M. ;
Kumaraswamy, Mohan M. .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2007, 133 (03) :225-234
[4]  
Bernstein H.M., 2011, PREFABRICATION MODUL
[5]   Benefit evaluation for off-site production in construction [J].
Blismas, Nick ;
Pasquire, Christine ;
Gibb, Alistair .
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2006, 24 (02) :121-130
[6]   Drivers of Conflict in Developing Country Infrastructure Projects: Experience from the Water and Pipeline Sectors [J].
Boudet, Hilary Schaffer ;
Jayasundera, Dilanka Chinthana ;
Davis, Jennifer .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 137 (07) :498-511
[7]  
Burke GP, 1998, POWER ENG, V102, P20
[8]  
Chan H., 2010, To talk or to fight? Collective effects of strategic, cultural, and institutional factors on investors'renegotiation approach in public- private concessions
[9]   Project Network Interdependency Alignment: New Approach to Assessing Project Effectiveness [J].
Chinowsky, Paul ;
Taylor, John E. ;
Di Marco, Melissa .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2011, 27 (03) :170-178
[10]  
Choi J.O., 2014, Master's Thesis