Flexural strengths of fiber-reinforced composites polymerized with conventional light-curing and additional postcuring

被引:44
作者
Cacciafesta, Vittorio
Sfondrini, Maria Francesca
Lena, Alessandro
Scribante, Andrea
Vallittu, Pekka K.
Lassila, Lippo V.
机构
[1] Univ Pavia, Dept Orthodont, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
[2] Univ Insubria, Varese, Italy
[3] Univ Turku, Inst Dent, Dept Prosthet Dent & Biomat Res, Turku, Finland
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.09.036
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of hand light-curing (Optilux 501; SDS Kerr, Danbury, Conn) and secondary oven polymerization (Liculite; Dentsply, Dreieich, Germany) on the mechanical properties of 2 sizes (diameters, 0.6 and 1.2 mm) of fiber-reinforced composites (FRCs) (Ever Stick; Stick Tech, Turku, Finland). Methods: The FRC samples were divided into 8 groups. Each group consisted of 10 specimens. Each FRC sample was evaluated with a 3-point bending test with a universal testing machine. Groups 1, 3, 5, and 7 were hand light-cured with a halogen curing unit for 40 seconds. Groups 2, 4, 6, and 8 were light-cured with the same curing unit for 40 seconds, followed by polymerization for 15 minutes in a light-curing oven. Groups 1 through 4 were tested at 1-mm deflection, and groups 5 through 8 at 2-mm deflection. Results: The results of ANOVA indicated significant differences among the various groups (P =.000). The post-hoc test showed that the 2-mm deflection groups had significantly higher flexural strengths than the 1-mm deflection groups (P =.000). Moreover, the 1.2-mm FRCs showed significantly higher flexural strength than the 0.6-mm FRCs (P =.000). No significant differences (P >.05) were found between the hand light-cured and the oven-polymerized groups. Conclusions: This investigation demonstrated that oven postcuring does not increase the flexural strength values of 0.6- and 1.2-mm FRCs compared with conventional hand light-curing. Thus, hand light-curing of FRCs is recommended directly in the mouth for orthodontic purposes.
引用
收藏
页码:524 / 527
页数:4
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   IMPLANT-FIXED, DENTAL BRIDGES FROM CARBON GRAPHITE FIBER REINFORCED POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE) [J].
BJORK, N ;
EKSTRAND, K ;
RUYTER, IE .
BIOMATERIALS, 1986, 7 (01) :73-75
[2]  
BURSTONE CJ, 2000, J CLIN ORTHOD, V24, P271
[3]   THE EFFECT OF CARBON-FIBER ORIENTATION ON THE FATIGUE RESISTANCE AND BENDING PROPERTIES OF 2 DENTURE RESINS [J].
DEBOER, J ;
VERMILYEA, SG ;
BRADY, RE .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1984, 51 (01) :119-121
[4]   Bond strength of fiber-reinforced composite bars for orthodontic attachment [J].
Freudenthaler, JW ;
Tischler, GK ;
Burstone, CJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2001, 120 (06) :648-653
[5]   THE USE OF CONTINUOUS FIBER REINFORCEMENT IN DENTISTRY [J].
GOLDBERG, AJ ;
BURSTONE, CJ .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1992, 8 (03) :197-202
[6]  
GRANT AA, 1967, AUST DENT J, V12, P29
[7]   Four applications of reinforced polyethylene fiber material in orthodontic practice [J].
Karaman, AI ;
Kir, N ;
Belli, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2002, 121 (06) :650-654
[8]   Flexural properties of fiber reinforced root canal posts [J].
Lassila, LVJ ;
Tanner, J ;
Le Bell, AM ;
Narva, K ;
Vallittu, PK .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2004, 20 (01) :29-36
[9]   PROSTHETIC USE OF CARBON FIBER-REINFORCED EPOXY-RESIN FOR AESTHETIC CROWNS AND FIXED PARTIAL DENTURES [J].
MALQUARTI, G ;
BERRUET, RG ;
BOIS, D .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1990, 63 (03) :251-257
[10]  
Marais J T, 1999, SADJ, V54, P123