Patient statement of satisfaction with antiemetic treatment is related to quality of life

被引:10
作者
Bosnjak, S [1 ]
Radulovic, S [1 ]
Neskovic-Konstantinovic, Z [1 ]
Mitrovic, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Oncol & Radiol Serbia, YU-11000 Belgrade, Yugoslavia
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS | 2000年 / 23卷 / 06期
关键词
quality of life; breast cancer; antiemetic treatment; patient satisfaction;
D O I
10.1097/00000421-200012000-00008
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The aim of our study was to explore the possible relationship between patient satisfaction with antiemetic treatment and quality of life (QoL). The study sample consisted of 136 chemotherapy-naive patients with breast cancer, with Karnofsky index 90% to 100%, scheduled to receive their first cycle of, mainly adjuvant, 5-fluorouracil/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide chemotherapy. Two antiemetic regimens were used for the prevention of acute emesis. No antiemetic prophylaxis was given for delayed emesis. QoL was assessed using the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (RSCL). The RSCL was completed before chemotherapy (day 1) and on day 5. Statement of satisfaction was given on day 5. The change in RSCL scores between day 5 and day 1 was calculated and compared in three subgroups of patients: those very satisfied (n = 55), satisfied (n = 65), and unsatisfied with antiemetic treatment (n = 16). Patient statement of satisfaction was related to psychological distress (p = 0.002), physical symptom distress (p = 0.002), and activity level (p, = 0.002). It was also related to the control of nausea (p < 0.01) and vomiting (p < 0.0001). We suggest that patient statement of satisfaction with antiemetic treatment could be an outcome measure for response assessment in antiemetic trials.
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 578
页数:4
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   MEASURING PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PHYSICAL DISTRESS IN CANCER-PATIENTS - STRUCTURE AND APPLICATION OF THE ROTTERDAM-SYMPTOM-CHECKLIST [J].
DEHAES, JCJM ;
VANKNIPPENBERG, FCE ;
NEIJT, JP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1990, 62 (06) :1034-1038
[2]   Recommendations for the use of antiemetics: Evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines [J].
Gralla, RJ ;
Osoba, D ;
Kris, MG ;
Kirkbride, P ;
Hesketh, PJ ;
Chinnery, LW ;
Clark-Snow, R ;
Gill, DP ;
Groshen, S ;
Grunberg, S ;
Koeller, JM ;
Morrow, GR ;
Perez, EA ;
Silber, JH ;
Pfister, DG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (09) :2971-2994
[3]   Methodology of antiemetic trials: response assessment, evaluation of new agents and definition of chemotherapy emetogenicity [J].
Hesketh, PJ ;
Gralla, RJ ;
du Bois, A ;
Tonato, M .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 1998, 6 (03) :221-227
[4]   ASSESSING QUALITY OF LIFE IN CANCER-PATIENTS [J].
MAGUIRE, P ;
SELBY, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1989, 60 (03) :437-440
[5]  
PALMER MJ, 1995, QUAL LIFE RES, V4, P470
[6]   The impact of postchemotherapy nausea and vomiting on quality of life after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy [J].
Rusthoven, JJ ;
Osoba, D ;
Butts, CA ;
Yelle, L ;
Findlay, H ;
Grenville, A .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 1998, 6 (04) :389-395
[7]  
SOUKOP M, 1992, ONCOLOGY, V49, P295
[8]   Methodology of trials with antiemetics [J].
Tonato, M ;
Roila, F ;
DelFavero, A ;
Ballatori, E .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 1996, 4 (04) :281-286