Spatial and temporal variability of sources of ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in California

被引:113
作者
Hasheminassab, S. [1 ]
Daher, N. [1 ]
Saffari, A. [1 ]
Wang, D. [1 ]
Ostro, B. D. [2 ]
Sioutas, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[2] State Calif, Off Environm Hlth Hazard Assessment, Air Pollut Epidemiol Sect, Oakland, CA USA
关键词
POSITIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION; SPECIATION TRENDS NETWORK; CHEMICAL MASS-BALANCE; SAN-JOAQUIN VALLEY; LOS-ANGELES BASIN; SOURCE-APPORTIONMENT; ORGANIC-CARBON; AIR-POLLUTION; ULTRAFINE PARTICLES; DAILY MORTALITY;
D O I
10.5194/acp-14-12085-2014
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To identify major sources of ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5, dp < 2.5 mu m) and quantify their contributions in the state of California, a positive matrix factorization (PMF) receptor model was applied on Speciation Trends Network (STN) data, collected between 2002 and 2007 at eight distinct sampling locations, including El Cajon, Rubidoux, Los Angeles, Simi Valley, Bakersfield, Fresno, San Jose, and Sacramento. Between five to nine sources of fine PM were identified at each sampling site, several of which were common among multiple locations. Secondary aerosols, including secondary ammonium nitrate and ammonium sulfate, were the most abundant contributor to ambient PM2.5 mass at all sampling sites, except for San Jose, with an annual average cumulative contribution of 26 to 63 %, across the state. On an annual average basis, vehicular emissions (including both diesel and gasoline vehicles) were the largest primary source of fine PM at all sampling sites in southern California (17-18% of total mass), whereas in Fresno and San Jose, biomass burning was the most dominant primary contributor to ambient PM2.5 (27 and 35% of total mass, respectively), in general agreement with the results of previous source apportionment studies in California. In Bakersfield and Sacramento, vehicular emissions and biomass burning displayed relatively equal annual contributions to ambient PM2.5 mass (12 and 25 %, respectively). Other commonly identified sources at all sites included aged and fresh sea salt and soil, which contributed to 0.5-13%, 2-27 %, and 1-19% of the total mass, respectively, across all sites and seasons. In addition, a few minor sources were identified exclusively at some of the sites (e.g., chlorine sources, sulfate-bearing road dust, and different types of industrial emissions). These sources overall accounted for a small fraction of the total PM mass across the sampling locations (1 to 15 %, on an annual average basis).
引用
收藏
页码:12085 / 12097
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Characterization and source apportionment of ambient air particulate matter (PM2.5) in Karachi [J].
Mansha, M. ;
Ghauri, Badar ;
Rahman, Said ;
Amman, Arif .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 425 :176-183
[42]   The impacts of reduction in ambient fine particulate (PM2.5) air pollution on life expectancy in Taiwan [J].
Tsai, Shang-Shyue ;
Chen, Chih-Cheng ;
Yang, Chun-Yuh .
JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH-PART A-CURRENT ISSUES, 2022, 85 (22) :913-920
[43]   Investigation of the chemical components of ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) associated with in vitro cellular responses to oxidative stress and inflammation [J].
Xu, Fanfan ;
Shi, Xiaodi ;
Qiu, Xinghua ;
Jiang, Xing ;
Fang, Yanhua ;
Wang, Junxia ;
Hu, Di ;
Zhu, Tong .
ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 136
[44]   Difference on oxidative stress in lung epithelial cells and macrophages induced by ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) [J].
Li, Ran ;
Wang, Yixuan ;
Qiu, Xinghua ;
Xu, Fanfan ;
Chen, Rucheng ;
Gu, Weijia ;
Zhang, Lu ;
Yang, Sijia ;
Cai, Ziwei ;
Liu, Cuiqing .
AIR QUALITY ATMOSPHERE AND HEALTH, 2020, 13 (07) :789-796
[45]   What's wrong with the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for fine particulate matter (PM2.5)? [J].
Green, LC ;
Crouch, EAC ;
Ames, MR ;
Lash, TL .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 35 (03) :327-337
[46]   Difference on oxidative stress in lung epithelial cells and macrophages induced by ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) [J].
Ran Li ;
Yixuan Wang ;
Xinghua Qiu ;
Fanfan Xu ;
Rucheng Chen ;
Weijia Gu ;
Lu Zhang ;
Sijia Yang ;
Ziwei Cai ;
Cuiqing Liu .
Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 2020, 13 :789-796
[47]   Determining spatial variability in PM2.5 source impacts across Detroit, MI [J].
Duvall, Rachelle M. ;
Norris, Gary A. ;
Burke, Janet M. ;
Olson, David A. ;
Vedantham, Ram ;
Williams, Ron .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 47 :491-498
[48]   Spatial and temporal variation of chemical composition and mass closure of ambient coarse particulate matter (PM10-2.5) in the Los Angeles area [J].
Cheung, Kalam ;
Daher, Nancy ;
Kam, Winnie ;
Shafer, Martin M. ;
Ning, Zhi ;
Schauer, James J. ;
Sioutas, Constantinos .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 45 (16) :2651-2662
[49]   Avoidable Mortality Attributable to Anthropogenic Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) in Australia [J].
Hanigan, Ivan C. ;
Broome, Richard A. ;
Chaston, Timothy B. ;
Cope, Martin ;
Dennekamp, Martine ;
Heyworth, Jane S. ;
Heathcote, Katharine ;
Horsley, Joshua A. ;
Jalaludin, Bin ;
Jegasothy, Edward ;
Johnston, Fay H. ;
Knibbs, Luke D. ;
Pereira, Gavin ;
Vardoulakis, Sotiris ;
Vander Hoorn, Stephen ;
Morgan, Geoffrey G. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (01) :1-9
[50]   Rat Lung Response to Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Exposures [J].
Wang, Guanghe ;
Zhao, Jinzhuo ;
Jiang, Rongfang ;
Song, Weimin .
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY, 2015, 30 (03) :343-356