Reliability and validity analyzes of Kinect V2 based measurement system for shoulder motions

被引:35
作者
Cubukcu, Burakhan [1 ]
Yuzgec, Ugur [1 ]
Zileli, Raif [2 ]
Zileli, Ahu [3 ]
机构
[1] Bilecik Seyh Edebali Univ, Dept Comp Engn, TR-11210 Bilecik, Turkey
[2] Bilecik Seyh Edebali Univ, Sch Hlth, TR-11210 Bilecik, Turkey
[3] Bilecik State Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Bilecik, Turkey
关键词
Shoulder pose; Reliability; Validity; Kinect V2; Measurement; XBOX ONE KINECT; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; REHABILITATION; VALIDATION; AGREEMENT; EXERCISE; BALANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.10.017
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Telerehabilitation systems provide some advantages against the classic rehabilitation methods. The ability of the shoulders depends on active motion range of them to do activities in daily life and to do sports. To evaluate the shoulder motions, range of motion (ROM) measurement is a basic method. Clinical goniometer and digital goniometer are the most commonly used measurement tools. However, these measurement tools have some deficiencies and difficulties. In this paper, we consider a Kinect One Sensor (Kinect V2) based measurement system for shoulder motions as an alternative method. The aim of this study is to examine the reliability and validity analyzes of the proposed shoulder measurement system. Three systems were used to evaluate validity of the Kinect V2 to measure shoulder motions: Kinect V2 based system, clinical goniometer and digital goniometer. One expert physical therapist measured shoulder abduction, flexion, external rotation, internal rotation and extension ROM values using a clinical goniometer and a digital goniometer in 40 healthy volunteers (22 males, 18 females, and 19-33 years old). All poses for each shoulder motion were captured with the Kinect V2 based system again and the ROM values were calculated. These procedures were carried out with all of the volunteer participants in three repetitions. In reliability for Kinect V2 based shoulder motion measurement system, we used the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of the measure (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC). The validity test includes the 95% limits of agreement (LOA) and mean difference between the Kinect V2 based system and the both of the goniometer systems for measuring shoulder motions. The high ICC values show that the Kinect V2 based shoulder motion measurement system has very good intra-rater reliability for abduction, flexion, external rotation, internal rotation shoulder poses. For extension pose, it has good reliability result according to the ICC value. The validity analysis gives good results for all shoulder poses except internal rotation between Kinect V2 and clinical/digital goniometer. As a result, Kinect V2 based measurement system is a reliable and valid alternative telerehabilitation tool for shoulder motions. (C) 2019 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 31
页数:12
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   MEASUREMENT IN MEDICINE - THE ANALYSIS OF METHOD COMPARISON STUDIES [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
BLAND, JM .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES D-THE STATISTICIAN, 1983, 32 (03) :307-317
[2]  
Amon C., 2014, P 6 C ALPS ADRIA ACO, P16
[3]  
Amon C, 2014, P ANN INT C IEEE ENG, P16
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, DESIGN ANAL CLIN EXP
[5]   Activity and heart rate-based measures for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation [J].
Bidargaddi, N. P. ;
Sarela, A. .
METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE, 2008, 47 (03) :208-216
[6]  
Bland JM, 1999, STAT METHODS MED RES, V8, P135, DOI 10.1177/096228029900800204
[7]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[8]   A Distributed System Using MS Kinect and Event Calculus for Adaptive Physiotherapist Rehabilitation [J].
Bragaglia, Stefano ;
Di Monte, Stefano ;
Mello, Paola .
2014 EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPLEX, INTELLIGENT AND SOFTWARE INTENSIVE SYSTEMS (CISIS),, 2014, :531-538
[9]  
Carstensen B, 2011, P IEEE INT S MED MEA
[10]  
Carstensen B., 2011, Comparing clinical measurement methods: A practical guide