The integrated function modeling framework and its relation to function structures

被引:17
作者
Gericke, Kilian [1 ]
Eisenbart, Boris [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Luxembourg, Res Unit Engn Sci, Belval, Luxembourg
[2] Swinburne Univ Technol, Sch Design, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
AI EDAM-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN ANALYSIS AND MANUFACTURING | 2017年 / 31卷 / 04期
关键词
Benchmarking; Conceptual Design; Flexibility; Function Modeling; Functional Perspectives; REPRESENTATION; ROLES;
D O I
10.1017/S089006041700049X
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Research and industrial practice have produced a host of function models and modeling approaches over the last decades. Each of these is meant to support designers in their design endeavors. Industrial practice is excessively diversified in terms of contextual requirements, aims, and adopted processes; this automatically begs the question which of the existing models should be selected for application in a specific situation. This paper sets out to contribute to this discourse. It strives to benchmark the fairly novel integrated function modeling (IFM) framework against the well-established function structures modeling approach. The paper comparatively investigates the respective capabilities of the approaches, following the benchmarking protocol used earlier in relation to this Special Issue. Function structures are used as reference as they represent one of the most widespread function modeling approaches in research and practice. Both function structures and the IFM framework are exemplarily applied for modeling a glue gun. The gradual generation and refinement of the models is used to showcase their respective benefits and shortcomings. Eventually, the IFM framework is found to excel over function structures in terms of comprehensiveness and support for different types of function analyses. Finally, future research directions are proposed.
引用
收藏
页码:436 / 457
页数:22
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
Alink T, 2010, THESIS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, P ASME INT DES ENG T
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, NEW BUSINESS OLD EUR
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, STRUCTURAL COMPLEXIT
[5]  
[Anonymous], P INT C ENG DES
[6]  
Aurisicchio M, 2012, P ASME DES ENG TECHN
[7]  
Aurisicchio M., 2011, P 18 INT C ENG DES
[8]  
Blessing L. T. M., 1997, P AIAA SAE WORLD AV
[9]   Comparing Functional Analysis Methods for Product Dissection Tasks [J].
Booth, Joran W. ;
Reid, Tahira N. ;
Eckert, Claudia ;
Ramani, Karthik .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2015, 137 (08)
[10]  
Brown D. C., 2005, P ASME INT DES ENG T