Life cycle thinking of plasma gasification as a waste-to-energy tool: Review on environmental, economic and social aspects

被引:48
作者
Ramos, Ana [1 ]
Rouboa, Abel [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Sci & Innovat Mech & Ind Engn, Associated Lab Energy & Aeronaut, LAETA INEGI, Rua Dr Roberto Frias 400, P-4200465 Porto, Portugal
[2] Univ Porto, Fac Engn, Dept Mech Engn, FEUP, R Dr Roberto Frias, P-4200465 Porto, Portugal
[3] Univ Penn, Sch Engn, Dept Mech Engn & Appl Mech, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Plasma; Gasification; LCA; LCC; Social assessment; Circular economy; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; ADVANCED THERMAL-TREATMENT; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; CIRCULAR ECONOMY; TECHNOLOGICAL ASPECTS; MANAGEMENT-SYSTEMS; RENEWABLE ENERGY; BIOMASS; LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2021.111762
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Following the actual pace of industrial development, due to the ever-growing tech-and resource-savvy society, unprecedented waste amounts are generated on a daily basis. Therefore, "waste-to-energy" (WtE) techniques appear as a possible approach to convert solid residues into energy, within more energy-efficient processes to emit less or no CO2. Plasma gasification constitutes a proficient and clean alternative with multiple environmental gains, simultaneously reducing or eliminating toxicity and pollution issues while avoiding the landfilling of huge amounts of residues. To evaluate the performance of this WtE treatment, the life cycle thinking (LCT) methodology gathers useful impact assessment tools, providing quantifiable indicators on multiple domains. The lack of works reporting the combined assessment of the environmental, technical, economic and social spheres of WtE has been previously noticed and, to the best of the authors' knowledge, there is no such review so far for plasma gasification. This work proposes a deep review of literature on the life cycle assessment, life cycle costing and social impact assessment of plasma gasification, to evaluate how LCT tools are applied to the energetic valorization of solid residues by this technique, as a measure of sustainability. This provides insights on the contribution of energy recovery as a circular strategy, diverting waste from open dumps or landfills, while producing renewable energy and/or by-products that will replace the use of virgin materials. Herein, an attempt to complement the knowledge in the sectors of renewable energies and waste management is conducted, to support the fulfillment of circular economy goals and contribute to a more sustainable society and way of living.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 197 条
[1]  
Affairs DfEFR, 2020, GUID PRIOR WAST COLL
[2]  
Agency EE, 2016, AN KEY TRENDS DRIV G
[3]  
Agency IE, 2013, Bioenergy
[4]   Modalities for conversion of waste to energy - Challenges and perspectives [J].
Ali, Jazib ;
Rasheed, Tahir ;
Afreen, Mutayyab ;
Anwar, Muhammad Tauqeer ;
Nawaz, Zahid ;
Anwar, Hafeez ;
Rizwan, Komal .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 727
[5]   Life Cycle Assessment of the Nitrogen Fixation Process Assisted by Plasma Technology and Incorporating Renewable Energy [J].
Anastasopoulou, Aikaterini ;
Butala, Sughosh ;
Lang, Juergen ;
Hessel, Volker ;
Wang, Qi .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2016, 55 (29) :8141-8153
[6]  
Angelo A.C.M., 2019, Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment for DecisionMaking: Methodologies and Case Studies, P253, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-818355-7.00012-9, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-818355-7.00012-9]
[7]   Production of solid biofuels from organic waste in developing countries: A review from sustainability and economic feasibility perspectives [J].
Angulo-Mosquera, Lina S. ;
Alvarado-Alvarado, Allan A. ;
Rivas-Arrieta, Maria J. ;
Cattaneo, Carlos R. ;
Rene, Eldon R. ;
Garcia-Depraect, Octavio .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 795
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2009, GUID SOC LIF CYCL AS
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ISO 14040 2006 ENV M, DOI DOI 10.1002/JTR
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Towards a life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: Making informed choices on products