One-Year Treatment Outcome of Profile Changes After Transcutaneous Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis in Growing Children With Cleft Lip and Palate

被引:3
|
作者
Gao, Wei-Ling [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Yi-Hao [1 ,2 ]
Tsai, Chi-Yu [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Te-Ju [1 ,2 ]
Lai, Jui-Pin [2 ,3 ]
Lin, Shiu-Shiung [1 ,2 ]
Chang, Yu-Jen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Kaohsiung Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Craniofacial Orthodont, Dept Dent, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] Kaohsiung Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
关键词
cleft lip; cleft palate; rigid external device; transcutaneous maxillary distraction; long-term stability; soft tissue profile; RIGID EXTERNAL DISTRACTION; DEVICE; STABILITY; SKELETAL; MIDFACE;
D O I
10.1177/10556656211005638
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the long-term stability of LeFort I osteotomy followed by distraction osteogenesis with a transcutaneous rigid external device for the treatment of severe maxillary hypoplasia in patients with cleft lip and palate. Patients and Methods: Nine patients with cleft lip and palate underwent rigid external distraction after a LeFort I osteotomy for maxillary advancement. Lateral cephalometric films were analyzed for assessment of treatment outcome and stability in 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year after distraction. Results: Significant maxillary advancement was observed in the horizontal direction, with the anterior nasal spine (ANS) distance of the maxilla increasing by an average of 20.5 +/- 5.1 mm after distraction. The ANS relapse rates in 6 months and 1 year were 8.7% and 12.8%, respectively. The mean inclination of upper incisors to the palatal plane was almost unchanged (before: 109.8 degrees +/- 6.6 degrees; after: 108.9 degrees +/- 7.5 degrees). The movement ratios at the nasal tip/ANS, soft tissue A point/A point, and the upper vermilion border/upper incisor edge were 0.36:1, 0.72:1, and 0.83:1, respectively. Conclusion: Considerable maxillary advancement was achieved with less change of incisors inclination after distraction. Moreover, the relapse rate after 1 year was minimal. The concave facial profile was improved as well as the facial balance and aesthetics.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 306
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Anterior maxillary segmental distraction in the treatment of severe maxillary hypoplasia secondary to cleft lip and palate
    Li, Hongliang
    Dai, Jiewen
    Si, Jiawen
    Zhang, Jianfei
    Wang, Minjiao
    Shen, Steve Guofang
    Yu, Hongbo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 8 (09): : 16022 - 16028
  • [22] Long-term follow-up of large maxillary advancements with distraction osteogenesis in growing and non-growing cleft lip and palate patients
    Meazzini, Maria Costanza
    Basile, Valentina
    Mazzoleni, Fabio
    Bozzetti, Alberto
    Brusati, Roberto
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2015, 68 (01) : 79 - 86
  • [23] Temporomandibular joint dislocation in patients with cleft lip and palate after maxillary distraction osteogenesis Three case reports
    Wang, Binqing
    Zhai, Junya
    Zheng, Yilue
    Tong, Haizhou
    Lu, Yang
    Chen, Zhewei
    Yin, Ningbei
    Song, Tao
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (06) : E24012
  • [24] Distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery for the treatment of maxillary hypoplasia in cleft lip and palate patients: a systematic review
    Austin, S. L.
    Mattick, C. R.
    Waterhouse, P. J.
    ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2015, 18 (02) : 96 - 108
  • [25] Skeletal and soft tissue changes and stability in cleft lip and palate patients after distraction osteogenesis using a new intraoral maxillary device
    Ansari, Edward
    Tomat, Catherine
    Kadlub, Natacha
    Diner, Patrick A.
    Bellocq, Thomas
    Vazquez, Marie-Paule
    Picard, Arnaud
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 43 (03) : 323 - 328
  • [26] Influence of Bone-Borne Trans-Sutural Distraction Osteogenesis Therapy on the Hard Palate of Growing Children With Cleft Lip and Palate
    Li, Sijia
    Zhang, Peiyang
    Chen, Yujie
    Fang, Lin
    Bai, Yanjie
    Zhao, Zhenmin
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 33 (02) : 390 - 394
  • [27] Early Dimensional Changes in Maxillary Cleft Size and Arch Dimensions of Children With Cleft Lip and Palate and Cleft Palate
    Reiser, Erika
    Skoog, Valdemar
    Andlin-Sobocki, Anna
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2013, 50 (04) : 481 - 490
  • [28] Speech outcome and velopharyngeal function in cleft palate: Comparison of Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis - Early results
    Chanchareonsook, Nattharee
    Whitehill, Tara L.
    Samman, Nabil
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2007, 44 (01) : 23 - 32
  • [29] Midfacial Changes Through Distraction Osteogenesis Using a Rigid External Distraction System With Retention Plates in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients
    Daimaruya, Takayoshi
    Imai, Yoshimichi
    Kochi, Shoko
    Tachi, Masahiro
    Takano-Yamamoto, Teruko
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2010, 68 (07) : 1480 - 1486
  • [30] Three-dimensional quantitative evaluation of midfacial skeletal changes after trans-sutural distraction osteogenesis for midfacial hypoplasia in growing patients with cleft lip and palate
    Tong, Haizhou
    Gao, Feng
    Yin, Jiapeng
    Shi, Zehong
    Song, Tao
    Li, Haidong
    Sun, Xiaomei
    Wang, Yongqian
    Yin, Ningbei
    Zhao, Zhenmin
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 43 (09) : 1749 - 1757