Comparison of radiological changes after single- position versus dual- position for lateral interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation

被引:63
作者
Hiyama, Akihiko [1 ]
Katoh, Hiroyuki [1 ]
Sakai, Daisuke [1 ]
Sato, Masato [1 ]
Tanaka, Masahiro [1 ]
Watanabe, Masahiko [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokai Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Surg Sci, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa 2591193, Japan
关键词
Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF); single-position (SP); dual-position surgery (DP); INDIRECT DECOMPRESSION; NEURAL DECOMPRESSION;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-019-2992-3
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background There have been few comparisons between dual positions, which require a position change, and a single position, which does not require position change, and it is not clear whether there is a difference in indirect decompression achieved by the two procedures. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare perioperative and radiographic outcomes following lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) in two cohorts of patients who underwent surgery in a single position or dual position. Methods This study involved 45 patients who underwent indirect decompression at 68 levels, with LLIF and percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) fixation for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal canal stenosis. Patient demographics and perioperative data were compared between two groups: patients who remained in the lateral decubitus position for pedicle screw fixation (SP group) and those turned to the prone position (DP group). Results A total of 26 DP and 19 SP patients were analyzed. The operation time was approximately 31 min longer for the DP group (129.7 +/- 36.0 min) than for the SP group (98.4 +/- 41.3 min, P < 0.01). We also evaluated the pre- and postoperative image measurements, there was no significant difference for lumbar lordosis, segmental disc angle, slipping length, and disc height between the groups. The CSA of the dural sac (DP group, from 55.3 to 78.4 mm(2); SP group, from 54.7 to 77.2 mm(2)) and central canal diameter (DP group, from 5.9 to 7.9 mm; SP group, from 5.6 to 7.7 mm) was significantly larger after surgery in both groups. However, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups (P = 0.684). Conclusions SP surgery could reduce the average surgery time by about 31 min. We found that the effect of indirect decompression by SP-PPS fixation following LLIF was considered to be a useful technique with no difference in dural sac enlargement or disc angle obtained compared with DP-PPS fixation.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Economic Performance of Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLLIF) with a Focus on Hospital Throughput Efficiency [J].
Abbasi, Hamid ;
Murphy, Christopher M. .
CUREUS, 2015, 7 (07)
[2]   Evaluation of Indirect Decompression of the Lumbar Spinal Canal Following Minimally Invasive Lateral Transpsoas Interbody Fusion: Radiographic and Outcome Analysis [J].
Elowitz, E. H. ;
Yanni, D. S. ;
Chwajol, M. ;
Starke, R. M. ;
Perin, N. I. .
MINIMALLY INVASIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2011, 54 (5-6) :201-206
[3]   Central and foraminal indirect decompression in MIS lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): video lecture [J].
Elowitz, Eric H. .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 24 :S449-S450
[4]   2001 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies:: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain -: A multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group [J].
Fritzell, P ;
Hägg, O ;
Wessberg, P ;
Nordwall, A .
SPINE, 2001, 26 (23) :2521-2532
[5]   The analysis of percutaneous pedicle screw technique with guide wire-less in lateral decubitus position following extreme lateral interbody fusion [J].
Hiyama, Akihiko ;
Sakai, Daisuke ;
Sato, Masato ;
Watanabe, Masahiko .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2019, 14 (01)
[6]   Two-Year Comparative Outcomes of MIS Lateral and MIS Transforaminal Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Part II: Radiographic Findings [J].
Isaacs, Robert E. ;
Sembrano, Jonathan N. ;
Tohmeh, Antoine G. .
SPINE, 2016, 41 (08) :S133-S144
[7]   Indirect foraminal decompression after lateral transpsoas interbody fusion Clinical article [J].
Kepler, Christopher K. ;
Sharma, Amit K. ;
Huang, Russel C. ;
Meredith, Dennis S. ;
Girardi, Federico P. ;
Cammisa, Frank P., Jr. ;
Sama, Andrew A. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2012, 16 (04) :329-333
[8]  
Kim SJ, 2014, J SEX MED, V11, P145
[9]   Comparison of Clinical and Radiologic Results of Mini-Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion Indirect Decompression for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis [J].
Kono, Yutaka ;
Gen, Hogaku ;
Sakuma, Yoshio ;
Koshika, Yasuhide .
ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 12 (02) :356-364
[10]   Potential and Limitations of Neural Decompression in Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion - A Systematic Review [J].
Lang, Gernot ;
Perrech, Moritz ;
Navarro-Ramirez, Rodrigo ;
Hussain, Ibrahim ;
Pennicooke, Brenton ;
Maryam, Farah ;
Avila, Mauricio J. ;
Hartl, Roger .
WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 101 :99-113