TEK and biodiversity management in agroforestry systems of different socio-ecological contexts of the Tehuacan Valley

被引:34
作者
Vallejo-Ramos, Mariana [1 ]
Moreno-Calles, Ana I. [2 ]
Casas, Alejandro [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Ctr Invest Geog Ambiental, Apartado Postal 27-3 Santa Maria Guido, Morelia 58190, Michoacan, Mexico
[2] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Escuela Nacl Estudios Super, Unidad Morelia, Apartado Postal 27-3 Santa Maria Guido, Morelia 58190, Michoacan, Mexico
[3] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Invest Ecosistemas & Sustentabilidad, Antigua Carretera Patzcuaro 8701, Morelia 58190, Michoacan, Mexico
来源
JOURNAL OF ETHNOBIOLOGY AND ETHNOMEDICINE | 2016年 / 12卷
关键词
Agroecology; Agroforestry systems; Sustainable management; TEK; Traditional management; STENOCEREUS-PRUINOSUS CACTACEAE; PLANT MANAGEMENT; INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE; TROPICAL FORESTS; CONSERVATION; COFFEE; LAND; DOMESTICATION; LANDSCAPES; DIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1186/s13002-016-0102-2
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Transformation of natural ecosystems into intensive agriculture is a main factor causing biodiversity loss worldwide. Agroforestry systems (AFS) may maintain biodiversity, ecosystem benefits and human wellbeing, they have therefore high potential for concealing production and conservation. However, promotion of intensive agriculture and disparagement of TEK endanger their permanence. A high diversity of AFS still exist in the world and their potentialities vary with the socio-ecological contexts. We analysed AFS in tropical, temperate, and arid environments, of the Tehuacan Valley, Mexico, to investigate how their capacity varies to conserve biodiversity and role of TEK influencing differences in those contexts. We hypothesized that biodiversity in AFS is related to that of forests types associated and the vigour of TEK and management. We conducted studies in a matrix of environments and human cultures in the Tehuacan Valley. In addition, we reviewed, systematized and compared information from other regions of Mexico and the world with comparable socio-ecological contexts in order to explore possible general patterns. Our study found from 26 % to nearly 90 % of wild plants species richness conserved in AFS, the decreasing proportion mainly associated to pressures for intensifying agricultural production and abandoning traditional techniques. Native species richness preserved in AFS is influenced by richness existing in the associated forests, but the main driver is how people preserve benefits of components and functions of ecosystems. Elements of modern agricultural production may coexist with traditional management patterns, but imposition of modern models may break possible balances. TEK influences decisions on what and how modern techniques may be advantageous for preserving biodiversity, ecosystem integrity in AFS and people's wellbeing. TEK, agroecology and other sciences may interact for maintaining and improving traditional AFS to increase biodiversity and ecosystem integrity while improving quality of life of people managing the AFS.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Socio-ecological drivers of vertebrate biodiversity and human-animal interfaces across an urban landscape
    Hassell, James M.
    Bettridge, Judy M.
    Ward, Melissa J.
    Ogendo, Allan
    Imboma, Titus
    Muloi, Dishon
    Fava, Francesco
    Robinson, Timothy P.
    Begon, Michael
    Fevre, Eric M.
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2021, 27 (04) : 781 - 792
  • [42] Applying fuzzy logic cognitive modeling to integrate socio-ecological knowledge for carnivore conflict management☆
    Prakash, Vasavi
    Gitzen, Robert A.
    Lepczyk, Christopher A.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2025, 303
  • [43] Spatial characterization of marine socio-ecological systems: A Portuguese case study
    Fernandes, Maria da Luz
    Larruga, Francisco Javier Sanz
    Alves, Fatima L.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 363
  • [44] Coastal Socio-Ecological Systems Adapting to Climate Change: A Global Overview
    Kanan, Akbar Hossain
    Giupponi, Carlo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (22)
  • [45] Unraveling the complex and dynamic Himalayan socio-ecological systems: a systematic review
    Shruthi Gopirajan, A. T.
    Kumar, Praveen
    Joshi, P. K.
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 24 (02) : 1532 - 1559
  • [46] Shaping the role of 'fast' and 'slow' drivers of change in forest-shrubland socio-ecological systems
    Ferrara, Agostino
    Kelly, Claire
    Wilson, Geoff A.
    Nole, Angelo
    Mancino, Giuseppe
    Bajocco, Sofia
    Salvati, Luca
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 169 : 155 - 166
  • [47] A methodological approach for assessing cross-site landscape change: Understanding socio-ecological systems
    Sunderland, Terry
    Abdoulaye, Rabdo
    Ahammad, Ronju
    Asaha, Stella
    Baudron, Frederic
    Deakin, Elizabeth
    Duriaux, Jean-Yves
    Eddy, Ian
    Foli, Samson
    Gumbo, Davison
    Khatun, Kaysara
    Kondwani, Mumba
    Kshatriya, Mrigesh
    Leonald, Laurio
    Rowland, Dominic
    Stacey, Natasha
    Tomscha, Stephanie
    Yang, Kevin
    Gergel, Sarah
    Van Vianen, Josh
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2017, 84 : 83 - 91
  • [48] Government extension, agroecology, and sustainable food systems in Belize milpa farming communities: A socio-ecological systems approach
    Drexler, Kristin A.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SYSTEMS AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 9 (03) : 85 - 97
  • [49] Temporal Changes in Socio-Ecological Systems and Their Impact on Ecosystem Services at Different Governance Scales: A Case Study of Heathlands
    Alejandra Morán-Ordóñez
    Rob Bugter
    Susana Suárez-Seoane
    Estanislao de Luis
    Leonor Calvo
    Ecosystems, 2013, 16 : 765 - 782
  • [50] Temporal Changes in Socio-Ecological Systems and Their Impact on Ecosystem Services at Different Governance Scales: A Case Study of Heathlands
    Moran-Ordonez, Alejandra
    Bugter, Rob
    Suarez-Seoane, Susana
    de Luis, Estanislao
    Calvo, Leonor
    ECOSYSTEMS, 2013, 16 (05) : 765 - 782