TEK and biodiversity management in agroforestry systems of different socio-ecological contexts of the Tehuacan Valley

被引:34
|
作者
Vallejo-Ramos, Mariana [1 ]
Moreno-Calles, Ana I. [2 ]
Casas, Alejandro [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Ctr Invest Geog Ambiental, Apartado Postal 27-3 Santa Maria Guido, Morelia 58190, Michoacan, Mexico
[2] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Escuela Nacl Estudios Super, Unidad Morelia, Apartado Postal 27-3 Santa Maria Guido, Morelia 58190, Michoacan, Mexico
[3] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Invest Ecosistemas & Sustentabilidad, Antigua Carretera Patzcuaro 8701, Morelia 58190, Michoacan, Mexico
来源
JOURNAL OF ETHNOBIOLOGY AND ETHNOMEDICINE | 2016年 / 12卷
关键词
Agroecology; Agroforestry systems; Sustainable management; TEK; Traditional management; STENOCEREUS-PRUINOSUS CACTACEAE; PLANT MANAGEMENT; INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE; TROPICAL FORESTS; CONSERVATION; COFFEE; LAND; DOMESTICATION; LANDSCAPES; DIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1186/s13002-016-0102-2
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Transformation of natural ecosystems into intensive agriculture is a main factor causing biodiversity loss worldwide. Agroforestry systems (AFS) may maintain biodiversity, ecosystem benefits and human wellbeing, they have therefore high potential for concealing production and conservation. However, promotion of intensive agriculture and disparagement of TEK endanger their permanence. A high diversity of AFS still exist in the world and their potentialities vary with the socio-ecological contexts. We analysed AFS in tropical, temperate, and arid environments, of the Tehuacan Valley, Mexico, to investigate how their capacity varies to conserve biodiversity and role of TEK influencing differences in those contexts. We hypothesized that biodiversity in AFS is related to that of forests types associated and the vigour of TEK and management. We conducted studies in a matrix of environments and human cultures in the Tehuacan Valley. In addition, we reviewed, systematized and compared information from other regions of Mexico and the world with comparable socio-ecological contexts in order to explore possible general patterns. Our study found from 26 % to nearly 90 % of wild plants species richness conserved in AFS, the decreasing proportion mainly associated to pressures for intensifying agricultural production and abandoning traditional techniques. Native species richness preserved in AFS is influenced by richness existing in the associated forests, but the main driver is how people preserve benefits of components and functions of ecosystems. Elements of modern agricultural production may coexist with traditional management patterns, but imposition of modern models may break possible balances. TEK influences decisions on what and how modern techniques may be advantageous for preserving biodiversity, ecosystem integrity in AFS and people's wellbeing. TEK, agroecology and other sciences may interact for maintaining and improving traditional AFS to increase biodiversity and ecosystem integrity while improving quality of life of people managing the AFS.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Interactive Videos Enhance Learning about Socio-Ecological Systems
    Smithwick, Erica
    Baxter, Emily
    Kim, Kyung
    Edel-Malizia, Stephanie
    Rocco, Stevie
    Blackstock, Dean
    JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 117 (01) : 40 - 49
  • [32] Drivers of Change in Socio-Ecological Production Landscapes: Implications for Better Management
    Gu, Hongyan
    Subramanian, Suneetha M.
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2014, 19 (01):
  • [33] Moving forward in collaborative forest management: Role of external actors for sustainable Forest socio-ecological systems
    Mohammed, Abrar J.
    Inoue, Makoto
    Shivakoti, Ganesh
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2017, 74 : 13 - 19
  • [34] Management of socio-ecological wetland systems using mulino decision support system and analytic network process
    Zare, G.
    Malekmohammadi, B.
    Jafari, H.
    Yavari, A. R.
    Nohegar, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 19 (04) : 2559 - 2572
  • [35] Managing landscape heterogeneity in different socio-ecological contexts: contrasting cases from central Loess Plateau of China and southern Finland
    Lu, Yihe
    Sun, Feixiang
    Wang, Jianglei
    Zeng, Yuan
    Holmberg, Maria
    Bottcher, Kristin
    Vanhala, Pekka
    Fu, Bojie
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2015, 30 (03) : 463 - 475
  • [36] A Socio-ecological Imperative for Broadening Participation in Coastal and Estuarine Research and Management
    L.A. Harris
    T. Grayson
    H.A. Neckles
    C.T. Emrich
    K.A. Lewis
    K.W. Grimes
    S. Williamson
    C. Garza
    C.R. Whitcraft
    J. Beseres Pollack
    D.M. Talley
    B. Fertig
    C.M. Palinkas
    S. Park
    J.M.P. Vaudrey
    A.M. Fitzgerald
    J. Quispe
    Estuaries and Coasts, 2022, 45 : 38 - 48
  • [37] Reviving shellfish reef socio-ecological histories for modern management and restoration
    Martin, Brad
    Huveneers, Charlie
    Reeves, Simon
    Baring, Ryan
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2025, 261
  • [38] Quantifying resilience of socio-ecological systems through dynamic Bayesian networks
    Franco-Gaviria, Felipe
    Amador-Jimenez, Monica
    Millner, Naomi
    Durden, Charlotte
    Urrego, Dunia H.
    FRONTIERS IN FORESTS AND GLOBAL CHANGE, 2022, 5
  • [39] A Socio-ecological Imperative for Broadening Participation in Coastal and Estuarine Research and Management
    Harris, L. A.
    Grayson, T.
    Neckles, H. A.
    Emrich, C. T.
    Lewis, K. A.
    Grimes, K. W.
    Williamson, S.
    Garza, C.
    Whitcraft, C. R.
    Pollack, J. Beseres
    Talley, D. M.
    Fertig, B.
    Palinkas, C. M.
    Park, S.
    Vaudrey, J. M. P.
    Fitzgerald, A. M.
    Quispe, J.
    ESTUARIES AND COASTS, 2022, 45 (01) : 38 - 48
  • [40] Mapping socio-ecological systems in Idaho: Spatial patterns and analytical considerations
    Aho, Ken
    Parsons, Susan
    Castro, Antonio J.
    Lohse, Kathleen A.
    ECOSPHERE, 2022, 13 (10):