Clinical significance of the expression of estrogen receptors α and β for endocrine therapy of breast cancer

被引:54
作者
Iwase, H
Zhang, ZH
Omoto, Y
Sugiura, H
Yamashita, H
Toyama, T
Iwata, H
Kobayashi, S
机构
[1] Nagoya City Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Oncol & Endocrinol, Mizuho Ku, Nagoya, Aichi 4678601, Japan
[2] Aichi Canc Ctr, Dept Breast Surg, Nagoya, Aichi 464, Japan
[3] Higashi Municipal Hosp Nagoya, Dept Surg, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
关键词
estrogen receptor; progesterone receptor; hormone responsiveness; immunohistochemistry; predictive factor;
D O I
10.1007/s00280-003-0592-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The assessment of the estrogen receptor (ER) a and the progesterone receptor (PgR) in breast cancer tissues is important for discriminating between hormone-dependent and hormone-independent tumors. ERbeta, a more recently discovered ER, may influence estrogen action through the ERalpha pathway. To evaluate the clinical significance of these receptors in the response to endocrine therapy, we investigated their expression in primary breast cancer tissues. ERalpha and PgR were evaluated using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and ERbeta expression was determined using IHC and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. When the cut-off level of EIA was set at 13 fmol/mg protein for ERalpha and that for IHC was set as an IHC score between 2 and 3, a significant correlation between ERalpha EIA and IHC was seen (concordance rate 88.4%). This indicates that this cut-off level of ERalpha IHC can be adopted to quantify breast cancer prognoses. Furthermore, the tumors with positive expression of ERa IHC or PgR IHC using this criterion were significantly related to the response to endocrine therapy. Additionally, tumors with positive expression of ERbeta wild-type tended to have a better response to endocrine therapy than negative ones, and tamoxifen responders tended to exhibit a lower ratio of ERbetacx (one of the ERbeta variants) to ERbeta wild-type than nonresponders. The results concerning ERbeta are not yet fully understood; further investigations and evaluations should analyze the role of ERbeta wild-type and variant type in breast cancer treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:S34 / S38
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   2000 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast and colorectal cancer: Clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology [J].
Bast, RC ;
Ravdin, P ;
Hayes, DF ;
Bates, S ;
Fritsche, H ;
Jessup, JM ;
Kemeny, N ;
Locker, GY ;
Mennel, RG ;
Somerfield, MR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (06) :1865-1878
[2]   Meeting highlights: International consensus panel on the treatment of primary breast cancer [J].
Goldhirsch, A ;
Glick, JH ;
Gelber, RD ;
Coates, AS ;
Senn, HJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (18) :3817-3827
[3]   Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer [J].
Harvey, JM ;
Clark, GM ;
Osborne, CK ;
Allred, DC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (05) :1474-1481
[4]   Recent advances in endocrine therapy of breast cancer [J].
Howell, A ;
Dowsett, M .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7112) :863-866
[5]  
Hu YF, 1998, INT J ONCOL, V12, P1225
[6]  
Iwase H, 1997, CANCER DETECT PREV, V21, P29
[7]   Estrogen receptor β is coexpressed with ERα and PR and associated with nodal status, grade, and proliferation rate in breast cancer [J].
Järvinen, TAH ;
Pelto-Huikko, M ;
Holli, K ;
Isola, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2000, 156 (01) :29-35
[8]   Estrogen receptors and proliferation markers in primary and recurrent breast cancer [J].
Jensen, EV ;
Cheng, GJ ;
Palmieri, C ;
Saji, S ;
Mäkelä, S ;
Van Noorden, S ;
Wahlström, T ;
Warner, M ;
Coombes, RC ;
Gustafsson, JÅ .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2001, 98 (26) :15197-15202
[9]   Comparison of five different antibodies in the immunohistochemical assay of estrogen receptor α in human breast cancer [J].
Kobayashi S. ;
Ito Y. ;
Ando Y. ;
Omoto Y. ;
Toyama T. ;
Iwase H. .
Breast Cancer, 2000, 7 (2) :136-141
[10]  
Leygue E, 1998, CANCER RES, V58, P3197