On qualitative multi-attribute group decision making and its consensus measure: A probability based perspective

被引:66
作者
Yan, Hong-Bin [1 ]
Ma, Tieju [1 ]
Van-Nam Huynh [2 ]
机构
[1] East China Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Business, Meilong Rd 130, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China
[2] Japan Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Sch Knowledge Sci, 1-1 Asahidai, Nomi City, Ishikawa 9231292, Japan
来源
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE | 2017年 / 70卷
关键词
Linguistic MAGDM; Random preference; Weights; Stochastic dominance; Consensus measure; LINGUISTIC PREFERENCE RELATIONS; TERM SETS; FUZZY ENVIRONMENT; OWA OPERATORS; AGGREGATION OPERATORS; CONSISTENCY MEASURES; FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT; PRODUCT-DEVELOPMENT; MODEL; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.omega.2016.09.004
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper focuses on qualitative multi-attribute group decision making (MAGDM) with linguistic information in terms of single linguistic terms and/or flexible linguistic expressions. To do so, we propose a new linguistic decision rule based on the concepts of random preference and stochastic dominance, by a probability based interpretation of weight information. The importance weights and the concept of fuzzy majority are incorporated into both the multi-attribute and collective decision rule by the so-called weighted ordered weighted averaging operator with the input parameters expressed as probability distributions over a linguistic term set. Moreover, a probability based method is proposed to measure the consensus degree between individual and collective overall random preferences based on the concept of stochastic dominance, which also takes both the importance weights and the fuzzy majority into account As such, our proposed approaches are based on the ordinal semantics of linguistic terms and voting statistics. By this, on one hand, the strict constraint of the uniform linguistic term set in linguistic decision making can be released; on the other hand, the difference and variation of individual opinions can be captured. The proposed approaches can deal with qualitative MAGDM with single linguistic terms and flexible linguistic expressions. Two application examples taken from the literature are used to illuminate the proposed techniques by comparisons with existing studies. The results show that our proposed approaches are comparable with existing studies. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:94 / 117
页数:24
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]   Ranking multi-attribute alternatives on the basis of linguistic labels in group decisions [J].
Agell, Nuria ;
Sanchez, Monica ;
Prats, Francesc ;
Rosello, Llorenc .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2012, 209 :49-60
[2]   TOPSIS for Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets [J].
Beg, Ismat ;
Rashid, Tabasam .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2013, 28 (12) :1162-1171
[3]  
BORDOGNA G, 1993, J AM SOC INFORM SCI, V44, P70, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199303)44:2<70::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-I
[5]   A linguistic modeling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operators [J].
Bordogna, G ;
Fedrizzi, M ;
Pasi, G .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 1997, 27 (01) :126-132
[6]   Analyzing consensus approaches in fuzzy group decision making: advantages and drawbacks [J].
Cabrerizo, F. J. ;
Moreno, J. M. ;
Perez, I. J. ;
Herrera-Viedma, E. .
SOFT COMPUTING, 2010, 14 (05) :451-463
[7]   Interactive group decision-making using a fuzzy linguistic approach for evaluating the flexibility in a supply chain [J].
Chuu, Shian-Jong .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2011, 213 (01) :279-289
[8]   ON AGGREGATION OPERATIONS OF LINGUISTIC LABELS [J].
DELGADO, M ;
VERDEGAY, JL ;
VILA, MA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 1993, 8 (03) :351-370
[9]   An extension of MACBETH method for a fuzzy environment to analyze alternatives in reverse logistics for automobile tire wastes [J].
Dhouib, Diala .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2014, 42 (01) :25-32
[10]   On consistency measures of linguistic preference relations [J].
Dong, Yucheng ;
Xu, Yinfeng ;
Li, Hongyi .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2008, 189 (02) :430-444