Bioactive-glass ceramic with two crystalline phases (BioS-2P) for bone tissue engineering

被引:13
作者
Ferraz, Emanuela Prado [1 ]
Freitas, Gileade Pereira [1 ]
Crovace, Murilo Camuri [2 ]
Peitl, Oscar [2 ]
Zanotto, Edgar Dutra [2 ]
de Oliveira, Paulo Tambasco [1 ]
Beloti, Marcio Mateus [1 ]
Rosa, Adalberto Luiz [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Cell Culture Lab, Sch Dent Ribeirao Preto, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Sao Carlos, Dept Mat Engn, Vitreous Mat Lab, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
bioactive glass-ceramic; Biosilicate (R); bone; mesenchymal stem cell; osteoblast; scaffold; MESENCHYMAL STEM-CELLS; IN-VITRO; OSTEOGENIC DIFFERENTIATION; SCAFFOLDS; REGENERATION; OSTEOBLASTS; VIVO; BIOSILICATE(R); EXPRESSION; POROSITY;
D O I
10.1088/1748-605X/aa768e
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
We aimed to evaluate the in vitro osteogenic and osteoinductive potentials of BioS-2P and its ability to promote in vivo bone repair. To investigate osteogenic potential, UMR-106 osteoblastic cells were cultured on BioS-2P and Bioglass 45S5 discs in osteogenic medium. The osteoinductive potential was evaluated using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) cultured on BioS-2P, Bioglass 45S5 and polystyrene in non-osteogenic medium. Rat bone calvarial defects were implanted with BioS-2P scaffolds alone or seeded with MSCs. UMR-106 proliferation was similar for both materials, while alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and mineralization were higher for BioS-2P. Bone sialoprotein (BSP), RUNX2 and osteopontin (OPN) gene expression and BSP, OPN, ALP and RUNX2 protein expression were higher on BioS-2P. For MSCs, ALP activity was higher on Bioglass 45S5 than on BioS-2P and was lower on polystyrene. All genes were highly expressed on bioactive glasses compared to polystyrene. BioS-2P scaffolds promoted in vivo bone formation without differences in the morphometric parameters at 4, 8 and 12 weeks. After 8 weeks, the combination of BioS-2P with MSCs did not increase the quantity of new bone compared to the BioS-2P alone. To stimulate osteoblast activity, drive MSC differentiation and promote bone formation, BioS-2P is a good choice as a scaffold for bone tissue engineering.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], [No title captured]
  • [2] Azenha MR, 2010, DENT J, V21, P383
  • [3] Bioactive glasses: Special applications outside the skeletal system
    Baino, Francesco
    Novajra, Giorgia
    Miguez-Pacheco, Valentina
    Boccaccini, Aldo R.
    Vitale-Brovarone, Chiara
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NON-CRYSTALLINE SOLIDS, 2016, 432 : 15 - 30
  • [4] Three-dimensional glass-derived scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: Current trends and forecasts for the future
    Baino, Francesco
    Vitale-Brovarone, Chiara
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A, 2011, 97A (04) : 514 - 535
  • [5] Beck GR, 1998, J CELL BIOCHEM, V68, P269, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4644(19980201)68:2<269::AID-JCB13>3.0.CO
  • [6] 2-A
  • [7] Beloti MM, 2012, TISSUE ENG PT A, V18, P999, DOI [10.1089/ten.tea.2011.0405, 10.1089/ten.TEA.2011.0405]
  • [8] Recent advances in bone tissue engineering scaffolds
    Bose, Susmita
    Roy, Mangal
    Bandyopadhyay, Amit
    [J]. TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2012, 30 (10) : 546 - 554
  • [9] Osteoblast-mediated mineral deposition in culture is dependent on surface microtopography
    Boyan, BD
    Bonewald, LF
    Paschalis, EP
    Lohmann, CH
    Rosser, J
    Cochran, DL
    Dean, DD
    Schwartz, Z
    Boskey, AL
    [J]. CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 71 (06) : 519 - 529
  • [10] 45S5 Bioglass®-derived glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
    Chen, QZZ
    Thompson, ID
    Boccaccini, AR
    [J]. BIOMATERIALS, 2006, 27 (11) : 2414 - 2425