The Methodology of "Varieties of Democracy" (V-Dem)

被引:51
作者
Coppedge, Michael [1 ]
Gerring, John [2 ]
Knutsen, Carl Henrik [3 ]
Krusell, Joshua [4 ]
Medzihorsky, Juraj [4 ]
Pernes, Josefine [4 ]
Skaaning, Svend-Erik [5 ]
Stepanova, Natalia [4 ]
Teorell, Jan [6 ]
Tzelgov, Eitan [7 ]
Wilson, Steven L. [8 ]
Lindberg, Staffan, I [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[3] Univ Oslo, Oslo, Norway
[4] Univ Gothenburg, V Dem Inst, Gothenburg, Sweden
[5] Aarhus Univ, Aarhus, Denmark
[6] Lund Univ, Lund, Sweden
[7] Univ East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[8] Univ Nevada, Reno, NV 89557 USA
来源
BMS-BULLETIN OF SOCIOLOGICAL METHODOLOGY-BULLETIN DE METHODOLOGIE SOCIOLOGIQUE | 2019年 / 143卷 / 01期
关键词
Aggregation; Democracy; Democratization; Dictatorship; Index; Indicators; Expert; survey; RATER; MODEL;
D O I
10.1177/0759106319854989
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
This article describes and discusses the new generation of methodological responses to measuring democracy and related issues generated by Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem). V-Dem is distinct in several regards in addition to its unique level of disaggregation, by the combination of: historical data extending back to 1900 and for a large selection among them to 1789 for many countries in the world; use of multiple, independent coders for each evaluative question; inter-coder reliability tests incorporated into a custom designed Bayesian item-response theory measurement model; provision of confidence bounds for all point estimates associated with expert-coded questions as well as for all indices; multiple indices reflecting varying theories of democracy; fully transparent aggregation procedures; and that all data are made freely available, including original coder-level judgments (exclusive of any personal identifying information).
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 133
页数:27
相关论文
共 36 条