The Methodology of "Varieties of Democracy" (V-Dem)

被引:51
作者
Coppedge, Michael [1 ]
Gerring, John [2 ]
Knutsen, Carl Henrik [3 ]
Krusell, Joshua [4 ]
Medzihorsky, Juraj [4 ]
Pernes, Josefine [4 ]
Skaaning, Svend-Erik [5 ]
Stepanova, Natalia [4 ]
Teorell, Jan [6 ]
Tzelgov, Eitan [7 ]
Wilson, Steven L. [8 ]
Lindberg, Staffan, I [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[3] Univ Oslo, Oslo, Norway
[4] Univ Gothenburg, V Dem Inst, Gothenburg, Sweden
[5] Aarhus Univ, Aarhus, Denmark
[6] Lund Univ, Lund, Sweden
[7] Univ East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[8] Univ Nevada, Reno, NV 89557 USA
来源
BMS-BULLETIN OF SOCIOLOGICAL METHODOLOGY-BULLETIN DE METHODOLOGIE SOCIOLOGIQUE | 2019年 / 143卷 / 01期
关键词
Aggregation; Democracy; Democratization; Dictatorship; Index; Indicators; Expert; survey; RATER; MODEL;
D O I
10.1177/0759106319854989
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
This article describes and discusses the new generation of methodological responses to measuring democracy and related issues generated by Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem). V-Dem is distinct in several regards in addition to its unique level of disaggregation, by the combination of: historical data extending back to 1900 and for a large selection among them to 1789 for many countries in the world; use of multiple, independent coders for each evaluative question; inter-coder reliability tests incorporated into a custom designed Bayesian item-response theory measurement model; provision of confidence bounds for all point estimates associated with expert-coded questions as well as for all indices; multiple indices reflecting varying theories of democracy; fully transparent aggregation procedures; and that all data are made freely available, including original coder-level judgments (exclusive of any personal identifying information).
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 133
页数:27
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Democracy, Interpretation and the "Problem" of Conceptual Ambiguity: Reflections on the V-Dem Project's Struggles with Operationalizing Deliberative Democracy
    Boswell, John
    Corbett, Jack
    POLITY, 2021, 53 (02) : 239 - 263
  • [2] Measuring high level democratic principles using the V-Dem data
    Coppedge, Michael
    Lindberg, Staffan
    Skaaning, Svend-Erik
    Teorell, Jan
    INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2016, 37 (05) : 580 - 593
  • [3] The protective and developmental varieties of liberal democracy: a difference in kind or degree?
    Joshi, Devin K.
    DEMOCRATIZATION, 2013, 20 (02) : 187 - 214
  • [4] Varieties of Transition from Authoritarianism to Democracy
    Priban, Jiri
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF LAW AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, VOL 8, 2012, 8 : 105 - 121
  • [5] V. I. Lenin on Democracy
    Pateman, Joe
    INTERNATIONAL CRITICAL THOUGHT, 2020, 10 (04) : 535 - 558
  • [6] A DEM methodology for simulating the grinding process of SiC ceramics
    Jiang, Shengqiang
    Li, Tiantian
    Tan, Yuanqiang
    NEW PARADIGM OF PARTICLE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH WORLD CONGRESS ON PARTICLE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 102 : 1803 - 1810
  • [7] Introducing the Historical Varieties of Democracy dataset: Political institutions in the long 19th century
    Knutsen, Carl Henrik
    Teorell, Jan
    Wig, Tore
    Cornell, Agnes
    Gerring, John
    Gjerlow, Haakon
    Skaaning, Svend-Erik
    Ziblatt, Daniel
    Marquardt, Kyle L.
    Pemstein, Daniel
    Seim, Brigitte
    JOURNAL OF PEACE RESEARCH, 2019, 56 (03) : 440 - 451
  • [8] Application of DEM-based metamodels in bulk handling equipment design: Methodology and DEM case study
    Fransen, Marc P.
    Langelaar, Matthijs
    Schott, Dingena L.
    POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 393 : 205 - 218
  • [9] A methodology for tribocharger design optimisation using the Discrete Element Method (DEM)
    Rasera, J. N.
    Cilliers, J. J.
    Lamamy, J. -a.
    Hadler, K.
    POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 413
  • [10] DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY V. POLITICS OF IDENTITY
    Perez De la Fuente, Oscar
    AGE OF HUMAN RIGHTS JOURNAL, 2013, (01): : 35 - 48