Atypical Presentations of Intracranial Hypotension: Comparison with Classic Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension

被引:32
|
作者
Capizzano, A. A. [1 ]
Lai, L. [2 ]
Kim, J. [3 ]
Rizzo, M. [4 ]
Gray, L. [5 ]
Smoot, M. K. [6 ]
Moritani, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Dept Radiol, Carver Coll Med, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Dept Neurol Sci, Omaha, NE USA
[5] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[6] Univ Kentucky, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Sports Med, Lexington, KY USA
关键词
REVERSIBLE FRONTOTEMPORAL DEMENTIA; CEREBROSPINAL-FLUID LEAKS; SECONDARY;
D O I
10.3174/ajnr.A4706
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The authors evaluated the clinical records and neuroimaging of patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension from September 2005 to August 2014. Patients with classic spontaneous intracranial hypotension (n = 33) were compared with those with intracranial hypotension with atypical clinical presentation (n = 8). There was no significant difference in dural enhancement, subdural hematomas, or cerebellar tonsil herniation. Patients with atypical spontaneous intracranial hypotension had significantly more elongated anteroposterior midbrain diameter compared with those with classic spontaneous intracranial hypotension, and shortened pontomammillary distance. In this population, patients with atypical spontaneous intracranial hypotension showed a more chronic syndrome compared with classic spontaneous intracranial hypotension, more severe brain sagging, lower rates of clinical response, and frequent relapses. BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Atypical clinical presentations of spontaneous intracranial hypotension include obtundation, memory deficits, dementia with frontotemporal features, parkinsonism, and ataxia(.) The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and imaging features of spontaneous intracranial hypotension with typical-versus-atypical presentations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical records and neuroimaging of patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension from September 2005 to August 2014 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients with classic spontaneous intracranial hypotension (n = 33; mean age, 41.7 14.3 years) were compared with those with intracranial hypotension with atypical clinical presentation (n = 8; mean age, 55.9 14.1 years) and 36 controls (mean age, 41.4 +/- 11.2 years). RESULTS: Patients with atypical spontaneous intracranial hypotension were older than those with classic spontaneous intracranial hypotension (55.9 +/- 14.1 years versus 41.7 +/- 14.3 years; P = .018). Symptom duration was shorter in classic compared with atypical spontaneous intracranial hypotension (3.78 +/- 7.18 months versus 21.93 +/- 18.43 months; P = .015). There was no significant difference in dural enhancement, subdural hematomas, or cerebellar tonsil herniation. Patients with atypical spontaneous intracranial hypotension had significantly more elongated anteroposterior midbrain diameter compared with those with classic spontaneous intracranial hypotension (33.6 +/- 2.9 mm versus 27.3 +/- 2.9 mm; P < .001) and shortened pontomammillary distance (2.8 +/- 1 mm versus 5.15 +/- 1.5 mm; P < .001). Patients with atypical spontaneous intracranial hypotension were less likely to become symptom-free, regardless of treatment, compared with those with classic spontaneous intracranial hypotension ((2) = 13.99, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of 8 patients, atypical spontaneous intracranial hypotension was a more chronic syndrome compared with classic spontaneous intracranial hypotension, with more severe brain sagging, lower rates of clinical response, and frequent relapses. Awareness of atypical presentations of spontaneous intracranial hypotension is paramount.
引用
收藏
页码:1256 / 1261
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Intracranial Hypotension and Intracranial Hypertension
    Yuh, Esther L.
    Dillon, William P.
    NEUROIMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2010, 20 (04) : 597 - +
  • [22] Minimally invasive repair of spontaneous intracranial hypotension
    Farhat, Hamad I.
    Hood, Brian
    Vanni, Steven
    Levi, Allan D.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2011, 114 (02) : 505 - 509
  • [23] Spinal Imaging Findings in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension
    Medina, Jocelyn H.
    Abrams, Kevin
    Falcone, Steven
    Bhatia, Rita G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 195 (02) : 459 - 464
  • [24] Challenges in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension
    Dillon, William P.
    RADIOLOGY, 2018, 289 (03) : 773 - 774
  • [25] Coma A serious complication of spontaneous intracranial hypotension
    Schievink, Wouter I.
    Maya, M. Marcel
    Moser, Franklin G.
    Jean-Pierre, Stacey
    Nuno, Miriam
    NEUROLOGY, 2018, 90 (19) : E1638 - E1645
  • [26] Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension Presentation, Diagnosis and Treatment
    Urbach, Horst
    Fung, Christian
    Dovi-Akue, Philippe
    Luetzen, Niklas
    Beck, Juergen
    DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 117 (27-28): : 480 - 487
  • [27] Infratentorial Superficial Siderosis and Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension
    Schievink, Wouter, I
    Maya, M. Marcel
    Harris, Jennifer
    Galvan, Javier
    Tache, Rachelle B.
    Nuno, Miriam
    ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2023, 93 (01) : 64 - 75
  • [28] SPONTANEOUS INTRACRANIAL HYPOTENSION AS AN INCIDENTAL FINDING ON MRI
    Schievink, Wouter I.
    Mamelak, Adam N.
    Maya, M. Marcel
    NEUROLOGY, 2012, 79 (12) : 1298 - 1299
  • [29] Update on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension
    Kranz, Peter G.
    Malinzak, Michael D.
    Amrhein, Timothy J.
    Gray, Linda
    CURRENT PAIN AND HEADACHE REPORTS, 2017, 21 (08)
  • [30] Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment
    Kranz, Peter G.
    Gray, Linda
    Malinzak, Michael D.
    Amrhein, Timothy J.
    NEUROIMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2019, 29 (04) : 581 - +