Atypical Presentations of Intracranial Hypotension: Comparison with Classic Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension

被引:32
|
作者
Capizzano, A. A. [1 ]
Lai, L. [2 ]
Kim, J. [3 ]
Rizzo, M. [4 ]
Gray, L. [5 ]
Smoot, M. K. [6 ]
Moritani, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Dept Radiol, Carver Coll Med, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Dept Neurol Sci, Omaha, NE USA
[5] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[6] Univ Kentucky, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Sports Med, Lexington, KY USA
关键词
REVERSIBLE FRONTOTEMPORAL DEMENTIA; CEREBROSPINAL-FLUID LEAKS; SECONDARY;
D O I
10.3174/ajnr.A4706
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The authors evaluated the clinical records and neuroimaging of patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension from September 2005 to August 2014. Patients with classic spontaneous intracranial hypotension (n = 33) were compared with those with intracranial hypotension with atypical clinical presentation (n = 8). There was no significant difference in dural enhancement, subdural hematomas, or cerebellar tonsil herniation. Patients with atypical spontaneous intracranial hypotension had significantly more elongated anteroposterior midbrain diameter compared with those with classic spontaneous intracranial hypotension, and shortened pontomammillary distance. In this population, patients with atypical spontaneous intracranial hypotension showed a more chronic syndrome compared with classic spontaneous intracranial hypotension, more severe brain sagging, lower rates of clinical response, and frequent relapses. BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Atypical clinical presentations of spontaneous intracranial hypotension include obtundation, memory deficits, dementia with frontotemporal features, parkinsonism, and ataxia(.) The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and imaging features of spontaneous intracranial hypotension with typical-versus-atypical presentations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical records and neuroimaging of patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension from September 2005 to August 2014 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients with classic spontaneous intracranial hypotension (n = 33; mean age, 41.7 14.3 years) were compared with those with intracranial hypotension with atypical clinical presentation (n = 8; mean age, 55.9 14.1 years) and 36 controls (mean age, 41.4 +/- 11.2 years). RESULTS: Patients with atypical spontaneous intracranial hypotension were older than those with classic spontaneous intracranial hypotension (55.9 +/- 14.1 years versus 41.7 +/- 14.3 years; P = .018). Symptom duration was shorter in classic compared with atypical spontaneous intracranial hypotension (3.78 +/- 7.18 months versus 21.93 +/- 18.43 months; P = .015). There was no significant difference in dural enhancement, subdural hematomas, or cerebellar tonsil herniation. Patients with atypical spontaneous intracranial hypotension had significantly more elongated anteroposterior midbrain diameter compared with those with classic spontaneous intracranial hypotension (33.6 +/- 2.9 mm versus 27.3 +/- 2.9 mm; P < .001) and shortened pontomammillary distance (2.8 +/- 1 mm versus 5.15 +/- 1.5 mm; P < .001). Patients with atypical spontaneous intracranial hypotension were less likely to become symptom-free, regardless of treatment, compared with those with classic spontaneous intracranial hypotension ((2) = 13.99, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of 8 patients, atypical spontaneous intracranial hypotension was a more chronic syndrome compared with classic spontaneous intracranial hypotension, with more severe brain sagging, lower rates of clinical response, and frequent relapses. Awareness of atypical presentations of spontaneous intracranial hypotension is paramount.
引用
收藏
页码:1256 / 1261
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension Without Intracranial Hypotension
    Peeraully, Tasneem
    Rosenberg, Michael L.
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 31 (03) : 248 - 251
  • [2] Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension: Case Series of Rare Clinical Presentations
    Chaudhary, N.
    Cooper, P.
    Lownie, S. P.
    Ng, W.
    Duggal, N.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 38 (01) : 54 - 58
  • [3] Spontaneous intracranial hypotension
    Zitek, H.
    Stratilova, M.
    Radovnicky, T.
    Sejkorova, A.
    Klzo, L. Hofmann
    Sames, M.
    CESKA A SLOVENSKA NEUROLOGIE A NEUROCHIRURGIE, 2022, 85 (01) : 18 - 23
  • [4] A Review of Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension
    Upadhyaya, Parth
    Ailani, Jessica
    CURRENT NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE REPORTS, 2019, 19 (05)
  • [5] Familial spontaneous intracranial hypotension
    Larrosa, D.
    Vazquez, J. L.
    Mateo, I.
    Infante, J.
    NEUROLOGIA, 2009, 24 (07): : 485 - 487
  • [6] Frequency of intracranial aneurysms in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension
    Schievink, Wouter I.
    Maya, M. Marcel
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2011, 115 (01) : 113 - 115
  • [7] Noninvasive assessment of intracranial elastance and pressure in spontaneous intracranial hypotension by MRI
    Tsai, Yi-Hsin
    Chen, Hung-Chieh
    Tung, Hsin
    Wu, Yi-Ying
    Chen, Hsian-Min
    Pan, Kuan-Jung
    Cheng, Da-Chuan
    Chen, Jeon-Hor
    Chen, Clayton Chi-Chang
    Chai, Jyh-Wen
    Shen, Wu-Chung
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2018, 48 (05) : 1255 - 1263
  • [8] Hyperprolactinemia due to spontaneous intracranial hypotension
    Schievink, Wouter I.
    Nuno, Miriam
    Rozen, Todd D.
    Maya, M. Marcel
    Mamelak, Adam N.
    Carmichael, John
    Bonert, Vivien S.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 122 (05) : 1020 - 1025
  • [9] Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension in Childhood and Adolescence
    Schievink, Wouter I.
    Maya, M. Marcel
    Louy, Charles
    Moser, Franklin G.
    Sloninsky, Liliana
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2013, 163 (02) : 504 - +
  • [10] Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension: Dilemmas in Diagnosis
    Rahman, Maryam
    Bidari, Sharatchandra S.
    Quisling, Ron G.
    Friedman, William A.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2011, 69 (01) : 4 - 14