A conceptual framework for improving effectiveness of risk management in supply networks

被引:23
作者
Chaudhuri, Atanu [1 ]
Ghadge, Abhijeet [2 ]
Gaudenzi, Barbara [3 ]
Dani, Samir [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Durham, Sch Business, Durham, England
[2] Cranfield Univ, Cranfield Sch Management, Cranfield, Beds, England
[3] Univ Verona, Dept Business Adm, Verona, Italy
[4] Univ Huddersfield, Huddersfield Business Sch, Huddersfield, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Supply chain risk management; Supply chain integration; Supply network characteristics; Conceptual framework; CHAIN RISK; TRANSACTION COSTS; INTEGRATION; RESILIENCE; COLLABORATION; IMPACT; PERFORMANCE; DISRUPTIONS; COMPLEXITY; MITIGATION;
D O I
10.1108/IJLM-11-2018-0289
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of the paper is to develop a conceptual framework for improving the effectiveness of risk management in supply networks following a critical literature review. Design/methodology/approach A critical review of 91 scholarly journal articles published between 2000 and 2018 supports the development of an integrated conceptual framework. Findings The findings emphasize that supply chain integration (SCI) can have both a positive and negative impact on the effectiveness of risk management in supply networks. It is possible to have a positive effect when SCI can be used to develop competencies in joint risk planning within the organization and with wider supply network members and, in turn, to develop collaborative risk management capabilities. Supply network characteristics can influence whether and the extent to which SCI has a positive or negative impact on risk management effectiveness. Originality value Moving beyond recent (systematic) reviews on supply chain risk management, this study develops a novel conceptual framework interlinking SCI and the effectiveness of risk management while considering network characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 98
页数:22
相关论文
共 121 条
  • [31] 2-Z
  • [32] The buyer-supplier social contract: information sharing as a deterrent to unethical behaviors
    Eckerd, Stephanie
    Hill, James A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2012, 32 (1-2) : 238 - 255
  • [33] Learning orientation, integration, and supply chain risk management in Chinese manufacturing firms
    Ellinger, Alexander E.
    Chen, Haozhe
    Tian, Yu
    Armstrong, Craig
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS-RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2015, 18 (06) : 476 - 493
  • [34] Avoiding quality fade in Chinese global supply chains Designing appropriate governance structures
    Enderwick, Peter
    [J]. BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2009, 15 (06) : 876 - 894
  • [35] Supply chain risk mitigation: modeling the enablers
    Faisal, Mohd Nishat
    Banwet, D. K.
    Shankar, Ravi
    [J]. BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2006, 12 (04) : 535 - 552
  • [36] An information processing perspective on supply chain risk management: Antecedents, mechanism, and consequences
    Fan, Huan
    Li, Gang
    Sun, Hongyi
    Cheng, T. C. E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2017, 185 : 63 - 75
  • [37] The Effectiveness of Supply Chain Risk Information Processing Capability: An Information Processing Perspective
    Fan, Huan
    Cheng, T. C. E.
    Li, Gang
    Lee, Peter K. C.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2016, 63 (04) : 414 - 425
  • [38] A review of supply chain risk management: definition, theory, and research agenda
    Fan, Yiyi
    Stevenson, Mark
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL DISTRIBUTION & LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2018, 48 (03) : 205 - 230
  • [39] The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach
    Flynn, Barbara B.
    Huo, Baofeng
    Zhao, Xiande
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2010, 28 (01) : 58 - 71
  • [40] Collaborative risk management: a systematic literature review
    Friday, Derek
    Ryan, Suzanne
    Sridharan, Ramaswami
    Collins, David
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL DISTRIBUTION & LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2018, 48 (03) : 231 - 253