Development and Validation of a Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Machine Learning Model for TMJ Pathologies

被引:23
作者
Orhan, Kaan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Driesen, Lukas [1 ,2 ]
Shujaat, Sohaib [1 ,2 ]
Jacobs, Reinhilde [1 ,2 ]
Chai, Xiangfei [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leuven, Fac Med, Dept Imaging & Pathol, OMFS IMPATH Res Grp, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Univ Hosp Leuven, Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Leuven, Belgium
[3] Ankara Univ, Dept DentoMaxillofacial Radiol, Fac Dent, Ankara, Turkey
[4] Ankara Univ, Med Design Applicat & Res Ctr MEDITAM, Ankara, Turkey
[5] Huiying Med Technol Co Ltd, Room C103,B2,Dongsheng Sci & Technol Pk, Beijing 100192, Peoples R China
关键词
TEMPOROMANDIBULAR DISORDERS; DIAGNOSTIC-CRITERIA; SIGNAL INTENSITY; DISC; CLASSIFICATION; MORPHOLOGY; IMAGES;
D O I
10.1155/2021/6656773
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to propose a machine learning model and assess its ability to classify TMJ pathologies on magnetic resonance (MR) images. This retrospective cohort study included 214 TMJs from 107 patients with TMJ signs and symptoms. A radiomics platform was used to extract (Huiying Medical Technology Co., Ltd., China) imaging features of TMJ pathologies, condylar bone changes, and disc displacements. Thereafter, different machine learning (ML) algorithms and logistic regression were implemented on radiomic features for feature selection, classification, and prediction. The following radiomic features included first-order statistics, shape, texture, gray-level cooccurrence matrix (GLCM), gray-level run length matrix (GLRLM), and gray-level size zone matrix (GLSZM). Six classifiers, including logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), XGBoost, and support vector machine (SVM) were used for model building which could predict the TMJ pathologies. The performance of models was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, and ROC curve. KNN and RF classifiers were found to be the most optimal machine learning model for the prediction of TMJ pathologies. The AUC, sensitivity, and specificity for the training set were 0.89 and 1, while those for the testing set were 0.77 and 0.74, respectively, for condylar changes and disc displacement, respectively. For TMJ condylar bone changes Large-Area High-Gray-Level Emphasis, Gray-Level Nonuniformity, Long-Run Emphasis Long-Run High-Gray-Level Emphasis, Flatness, and Volume features, while for TMJ disc displacements Average Intensity, Sum Average, Spherical Disproportion, and Entropy features, were selected. This study has proposed a machine learning model by KNN and RF analysis on TMJ MR images, which can be used to classify condylar changes and TMJ disc displacements.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (RDC/TMD): development of image analysis criteria and examiner reliability for image analysis
    Ahmad, Mansur
    Hollender, Lars
    Anderson, Quentin
    Kartha, Krishnan
    Ohrbach, Richard
    Truelove, Edmond L.
    John, Mike T.
    Schiffman, Eric L.
    [J]. ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2009, 107 (06): : 844 - 860
  • [2] Nearest Consensus Clustering Classification to Identify Subclasses and Predict Disease
    Alyousef A.A.
    Nihtyanova S.
    Denton C.
    Bosoni P.
    Bellazzi R.
    Tucker A.
    [J]. Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research, 2018, 2 (4) : 402 - 422
  • [3] MRI evaluation of the classification, frequency, and disc morphology of temporomandibular joint disc displacements: a multicenter retrospective study in a Turkish population
    Arslan, Ahmet
    Orhan, Kaan
    Paksoy, Candan Semra
    Ucok, Ozlem
    Ozbek, Murat
    Dural, Sema
    Kanli, Aydan
    [J]. ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2009, 25 (01) : 14 - 21
  • [4] Barchetti F, 2014, EUR REV MED PHARMACO, V18, P2983
  • [5] Software comparison to analyze bone radiomics from high resolution CBCT scans of mandibular condyles
    Bianchi, Jonas
    Goncalves, Joao Roberto
    Ruellas, Antonio Carlos de Oliveira
    Vimort, Jean-Baptiste
    Yatabe, Marilia
    Paniagua, Beatriz
    Hernandez, Pablo
    Benavides, Erika
    Soki, Fabiana Naomi
    Cevidanes, Lucia Helena Soares
    [J]. DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 48 (06)
  • [6] Burges C.J., 2003, Summer School on Machine Learning, P21
  • [7] Can we trust the calculation of texture indices of CT images? A phantom study
    Caramella, Caroline
    Allorant, Adrien
    Orlhac, Fanny
    Bidault, Francois
    Asselain, Bernard
    Ammari, Samy
    Jaranowski, Patricia
    Moussier, Aurelie
    Balleyguier, Corinne
    Lassau, Nathalie
    Pitre-Champagnat, Stephanie
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (04) : 1529 - 1536
  • [8] Deep Learning: A Primer for Radiologists
    Chartrand, Gabriel
    Cheng, Phillip M.
    Vorontsov, Eugene
    Drozdzal, Michal
    Turcotte, Simon
    Pal, Christopher J.
    Kadoury, Samuel
    Tang, An
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 2017, 37 (07) : 2113 - 2131
  • [9] Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data
    Gillies, Robert J.
    Kinahan, Paul E.
    Hricak, Hedvig
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2016, 278 (02) : 563 - 577
  • [10] Goder A, 2008, SIAM PROC S, P109