Efficacy of Instant Hand Sanitizers against Foodborne Pathogens Compared with Hand Washing with Soap and Water in Food Preparation Settings: A Systematic Review

被引:44
作者
Foddai, Antonio C. G. [1 ]
Grant, Irene R. [2 ]
Dean, Moira [2 ]
机构
[1] Glasgow Caledonian Univ, Dept Life Sci, Sch Hlth & Life Sci, Cowcaddens Rd, Glasgow G4 0BA, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Biol Sci, Inst Global Food Secur, Belfast BT9 5BN, Antrim, North Ireland
关键词
Foodbome pathogens; Food settings; Hand sanitizers; Hand washing; Soiled hands; FELINE CALICIVIRUS; SYNERGISTIC COMBINATION; IN-VITRO; SPREAD; OUTBREAKS; WORKERS; INACTIVATION; SURROGATE; DISEASE; HYGIENE;
D O I
10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-492
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Hands can be a vector for transmitting pathogenic microorganisms to foodstuffs and drinks, and to the mouths of susceptible hosts. Hand washing is the primary barrier to prevent transmission of enteric pathogens via cross-contamination from infected persons. Conventional hand washing involves the use of water, soap, and friction to remove dirt and microorganisms. The availability of hand sanitizing products for use when water and soap are unavailable has increased in recent years. The aim of this systematic review was to collate scientific information on the efficacy of hand sanitizers compared with washing hands with soap and water for the removal of foodborne pathogens from the hands of food handlers. An extensive literature search was carried out using three electronic databases: Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed. Twenty-eight scientific publications were ultimately included in the review. Analysis of this literature revealed various limitations in the scientific information owing to the absence of a standardized protocol for evaluating the efficacy of hand products and variation in experimental conditions. However, despite conflicting results, scientific evidence seems to support the historical skepticism about the use of waterless hand sanitizers in food preparation settings. Water and soap appear to be more effective than waterless products for removal of soil and microorganisms from hands. Alcohol-based products achieve rapid and effective inactivation of various bacteria, but their efficacy is generally lower against nonenveloped viruses. The presence of food debris significantly affects the microbial inactivation rate of hand sanitizers.
引用
收藏
页码:1040 / 1054
页数:15
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   New non-alcoholic formulation for hand disinfection [J].
Biagi, Marco ;
Giachetti, Daniela ;
Miraldi, Elisabetta ;
Figura, Natale .
JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY, 2014, 26 (02) :86-91
[2]   The effectiveness of hand hygiene procedures in reducing the risks of infections in home and community settings including handwashing and alcohol-based hand sanitizers [J].
Bloomfield, Sally F. ;
Aiello, Allison E. ;
Cookson, Barry ;
O'Boyle, Carol ;
Larson, Elaine L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2007, 35 (10) :S27-S64
[3]   A risk assessment approach to use of antimicrobials in the home to prevent spread of infection [J].
Bloomfield, Sally F. ;
Scott, Elizabeth A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2013, 41 (05) :S87-S93
[4]  
Bonner C., 2001, IRAN MED J, V94, P365
[5]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009, VESS SAN PROGR OPRP
[6]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2002, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, V51, P1
[7]   A method of assessing the efficacy of hand sanitizers: Use of real soil encountered in the food service industry [J].
Charbonneau, DL ;
Ponte, JM ;
Kochanowski, BA .
JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2000, 63 (04) :495-501
[8]  
Courtenay M., 2005, Food Service Technology, V5, P77, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-5740.2005.00114.x
[9]  
Czerwinski SE, 2012, BRIT GLOBAL TRAV HLT, V20, P42
[10]   Novel water-based antiseptic lotion demonstrates rapid, broad-spectrum kill compared with alcohol antiseptic [J].
Czerwinski, Steven E. ;
Cozean, Jesse ;
Cozean, Colette .
JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 7 (03) :199-204