Conversion From Prograf to Advagraf Among Kidney Transplant Recipients Results in Sustained Decrease in Tacrolimus Exposure

被引:61
作者
Hougardy, Jean-Michel [1 ]
Broeders, Nilufer [1 ]
Kianda, Mireille [1 ]
Massart, Annick [1 ]
Madhoun, Phillippe [1 ]
Le Moine, Alain [1 ]
Hoang, Anh-Dung [1 ]
Mikhalski, Dimitri [1 ]
Wissing, Karl M. [1 ]
Abramowicz, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Clin Univ Hop Erasme, Dept Nephrol, Renal Transplantat Clin, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Tacrolimus; Transplantation; Kidney; Immunosuppressive therapy; LIVER;
D O I
10.1097/TP.0b013e3182098ff0
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Advagraf is a slow release form of tacrolimus with once-daily formulation. The potential advantages of Advagraf are better adherence and a safer profile by avoiding toxic peak concentrations. In this study, we evaluated the required daily doses of tacrolimus and subsequent blood levels on conversion from Prograf to Advagraf among kidney transplant recipients. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed data from 55 patients for whom a switch from Prograf to Advagraf was identified. Tacrolimus daily doses and concomitant blood levels were analyzed at several time points ranging from 3 months before to 6 months after conversion. Results. We observed a significant increase in tacrolimus daily doses, starting with a dose of 0.063 mg/kg of Prograf, increasing up to 0.081 mg/kg of Advagraf at 6 months (P < 0.0001). After conversion, we observed a quick and sustained decrease in trough tacrolimus levels, decreasing from 8.05 ng/mL at day 0 to 6.30 ng/mL at day 180 (P = 0.0009). At 6 months, 35% of patients experienced a decrease in trough levels of more than 30%. Creatinine values remained stable over time, and no patient experienced an acute rejection episode. Conclusions. Contrary to the manufacturer instructions, we found a significant decrease in tacrolimus exposure after switching to Advagraf. Therefore, the switch from Prograf to Advagraf should be performed under close medical supervision.
引用
收藏
页码:566 / 569
页数:4
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   Comparison of generic tacrolimus and Prograf drug levels in a pediatric kidney transplant program: Brief communication [J].
Abdulnour, Husam A. ;
Araya, Carlos E. ;
Dharnidharka, Vikas R. .
PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 14 (08) :1007-1011
[2]  
Alloway RR, 2009, TRANSPL INT, V22, P258
[3]  
*AST PHARM CAN 1, 2009, ADV MON PROD
[4]   Bioequivalence testing of immunosuppressants: concepts and misconceptions [J].
Christians, Uwe ;
Klawitter, Jelena ;
Clavijo, Claudia F. .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 77 :S1-S7
[5]   De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients Need Higher Doses of Advagraf Compared With Prograf to Get Therapeutic Levels [J].
Crespo, M. ;
Mir, M. ;
Marin, M. ;
Hurtado, S. ;
Estadella, C. ;
Guri, X. ;
Rap, O. ;
Moral, R. ;
Puig, J. M. ;
Lloveras, J. .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 41 (06) :2115-2117
[6]   P-glycoprotein related drug interactions: clinical importance and a consideration of disease states [J].
Lee, Caroline A. ;
Cook, Jack A. ;
Reyner, Eric L. ;
Smith, Dennis A. .
EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG METABOLISM & TOXICOLOGY, 2010, 6 (05) :603-619
[7]  
Ostrowski M, 2009, TRANSPL INT, V22, P196
[8]  
Thorburn D, 2009, TRANSPL INT, V22, P211
[9]   Rates of completion of the medical evaluation for renal transplantation [J].
Weng, FL ;
Joffe, MM ;
Feldman, HI ;
Mange, KC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2005, 46 (04) :734-745