Prioritizing soil conservation measures based on water erosion risk and production and bio-energy losses in peninsular South Indian states

被引:8
作者
Sharda, V. N. [1 ]
Mandal, Debashis [2 ]
Dogra, Pradeep [2 ]
机构
[1] ASRB, New Delhi, India
[2] ICAR Indian Inst Soil & Water Conservat, 218 Kaulagarh Rd, Dehra Dun 248195, Uttarakhand, India
关键词
Soil erosion; Erosion-induced production loss; Biomass and bio-energy; Strategies for soil conservation; Peninsular India; DIFFERENT PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS; CLIMATE-CHANGE IMPACTS; LOSS TOLERANCE; LAND DEGRADATION; RATES; AREAS; IDENTIFICATION; ENVIRONMENTS; MODELS; VALUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.catena.2021.105263
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Critical soil erosion risk areas in peninsular southern Indian states were identified through integration of biophysical and productivity loss following a robust scientific procedure (weighted average). Biophysical priority as a function of difference between soil erosion and corresponding soil loss tolerance values at a given location were redefined into three soil erosion risk classes, namely Low, Mid and High. Cumulative productivity losses, due to water erosion, of major crops grown in the area were also prioritized and an overall harmonization was made by integrating the two datasets. Analysis revealed that Kerala is suffering the most with a loss of 4.8 q ha(-1) followed by Karnataka (2.7 q ha(-1)), Andhra Pradesh (2.1 q ha(-1)) and Tamil Nadu (1.8 q ha(-1)) which is equivalent to annual production loss of about 2.31 M t of cereals, 0.83 M t of oilseeds and 0.52 M t of pulses due to water erosion. As per the weighted methodology, all states fall under Mid Priority class since the weighted values of these states are less than or equal to country's weighted value (16 t ha(-1)), but higher than half of the difference (i.e. 8 t ha(-1)) between weighted India value and lowest non-priority value (zero t ha(-1)). The energy loss in terms of aboveground biomass of all major crops has been estimated as 152 tera joules. The estimated production and energy losses due to soil erosion would greatly help in taking informed decisions for implementing appropriate conservation measures at local, regional and global level as the problem of soil erosion has not been addressed in an integrated manner so far.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   Evaluation of drought using SPEI drought class transitions and log-linear models for different agro-ecological regions of India [J].
Alam, N. M. ;
Sharma, G. C. ;
Moreira, Elsa ;
Jana, C. ;
Mishra, P. K. ;
Sharma, N. K. ;
Mandal, D. .
PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH, 2017, 100 :31-43
[2]   Soil erosion prediction in the Grande River Basin, Brazil using distributed modeling [J].
Beskow, S. ;
Mello, C. R. ;
Norton, L. D. ;
Curi, N. ;
Viola, M. R. ;
Avanzi, J. C. .
CATENA, 2009, 79 (01) :49-59
[3]  
Bhattacharyya P., 2007, Indian Journal of Fertilisers, V3, P93
[4]   Identification of areas vulnerable to soil erosion risk in India using GIS methods [J].
Biswas, H. ;
Raizada, A. ;
Mandal, D. ;
Kumar, S. ;
Srinivas, S. ;
Mishra, P. K. .
SOLID EARTH, 2015, 6 (04) :1247-1257
[5]   Land use and climate change impacts on global soil erosion by water (2015-2070) [J].
Borrelli, Pasquale ;
Robinson, David A. ;
Panagos, Panos ;
Lugato, Emanuele ;
Yang, Jae E. ;
Alewell, Christine ;
Wuepper, David ;
Montanarella, Luca ;
Ballabio, Cristiano .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2020, 117 (36) :21994-22001
[6]   An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion [J].
Borrelli, Pasquale ;
Robinson, David A. ;
Fleischer, Larissa R. ;
Lugato, Emanuele ;
Ballabio, Cristiano ;
Alewell, Christine ;
Meusburger, Katrin ;
Modugno, Sirio ;
Schuett, Brigitta ;
Ferro, Vito ;
Bagarello, Vincenzo ;
Van Oost, Kristof ;
Montanarella, Luca ;
Panagos, Panos .
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2017, 8
[7]  
Brady N.C., 2002, NATURE PROPERTIES SO, V74
[8]   'Tolerable' hillslope soil erosion rates in Australia: Linking science and policy [J].
Bui, Elisabeth N. ;
Hancock, Gary J. ;
Wilkinson, Scott N. .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 144 (01) :136-149
[9]  
Chasek P., 2014, J ARID ENV, V112
[10]   Land in balance: The scientific conceptual framework for Land Degradation Neutrality [J].
Cowie, Annette L. ;
Orr, Barron J. ;
Castillo Sanchez, Victor M. ;
Chasek, Pamela ;
Crossman, Neville D. ;
Erlewein, Alexander ;
Louwagie, Geertrui ;
Maron, Martine ;
Metternicht, Graciela I. ;
Minelli, Sara ;
Tengberg, Anna E. ;
Walter, Sven ;
Welton, Shelley .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2018, 79 :25-35