Measuring what matters and guiding policy: An evaluation of the Genuine Progress Indicator

被引:0
作者
Berik, Gunseli [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
关键词
economic evaluation; measurement system; gross domestic product; cross cultural analysis; well-being; economic development; methodology; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; WELFARE; STATE; ISEW;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article examines the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), which seeks to respond to the shortcomings of GDP and the main contemporary challenges to welfare. As a monetary indicator, the GPI is uniquely suited to evaluate the impact of policy proposals and its dashboard-like features are able to track changes in contributing variables. While the GPI is currently not available for use in crosscountry analyses, it will be measurable using a standard methodology once certain data issues have been resolved and a consensus is reached on GPI 2.0. Currently, the main obstacles to its widespread use are lack of political leadership and institutional support.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 94
页数:24
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
Algan Y., 2018, For Good Measure: Advancing Research on Well-being Metrics Beyond GDP, DOI [10.1787/9789264307278-12-en, DOI 10.1787/9789264307278-12-EN]
[2]  
Anielski M., 1999, The Genuine Progress Indicator - 1998 Update Redefining Progress
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, WEAK VERSUS STRONG SUSTAINABILITY: EXPLORING THE LIMITS OF TWO OPPOSING PARADIGMS, 4TH EDITION, VThird
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, SURVEY CURRENT BUSIN
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, 127 NIPFP
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2009, SYST NAT ACC 2008
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2013, 19 INT C LAB STAT 2
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1987, OUR COMMON FUTURE
[9]  
[Anonymous], Human development indicators
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Happy Planet Index 2016: Methods