A Pilot Study of a Collaborative Palliative and Oncology Care Intervention for Patients with Head and Neck Cancer

被引:2
作者
Bauman, Jessica R. [1 ]
Panick, Jessie R. [2 ]
Galloway, Thomas J. [1 ]
Ridge, John A. [1 ]
Chwistek, Marcin A. [1 ]
Collins, Molly E. [1 ]
Kinczewski, Leigh [1 ]
Murphy, Kathleen [1 ]
Welsh, Marie [1 ]
Farren, Matthew A. [1 ]
Omilak, Mollie Clark [1 ]
Kelly, Jacqueline [1 ]
Schuster, Katherine A. [1 ]
Lucas, Lauren A. [1 ]
Amrhein, Sheila [1 ]
Bender, Florence P. [1 ]
Temel, Jennifer S. [3 ]
Egleston, Brian L. [4 ]
El-jawahri, Areej [3 ]
Fang, Carolyn Y. [2 ]
机构
[1] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, 333 Cottman Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[2] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Canc Prevent & Control Program, 7701 Burholme Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Ctr Canc, Hematol Oncol, Boston, MA USA
[4] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Biostat & Bioinformat Facil, 7701 Burholme Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
关键词
chemoradiation therapy; head and neck cancer; palliative care; supportive care;
D O I
10.1089/jpm.2020.0656
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Palliative care improves symptoms and coping in patients with advanced cancers, but has not been evaluated for patients with curable solid malignancies. Because of the tremendous symptom burden and high rates of psychological distress in head and neck cancer (HNC), we evaluated feasibility and acceptability of a palliative care intervention in patients with HNC receiving curative-intent chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Methods: This was a prospective single-arm study in HNC patients receiving CRT at a single center in the United States. The intervention entailed weekly palliative care visits integrated with oncology care with a focus on symptoms and coping. The primary outcome was feasibility, defined as a >50% enrollment rate with >70% of patients attending at least half of the visits. To assess acceptability, we collected satisfaction ratings post-intervention. We also explored symptom burden, mood, and quality of life (QOL). Results: We enrolled 91% (20/22) of eligible patients. Patients attended 133 of 138 palliative care visits (96%); all 20 attended >85% of visits. Eighteen of 19 (95%) found the intervention "very helpful" and would "definitely recommend" it. QOL and symptom burden worsened from baseline to week 5, but subsequently improved at one-month post-CRT. Overall, patients valued the one-on-one format of the intervention and receipt of additional care. Conclusions: Our palliative care intervention during highly morbid CRT was feasible and acceptable with high enrollment, excellent intervention compliance, and high patient satisfaction. Future randomized studies will further explore the impact on patient-reported outcomes and health care utilization.
引用
收藏
页码:1673 / 1681
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [41] Early palliative care for patients with advanced cancer: a cluster-randomised controlled trial
    Zimmermann, Camilla
    Swami, Nadia
    Krzyzanowska, Monika
    Hannon, Breffni
    Leighl, Natasha
    Oza, Amit
    Moore, Malcolm
    Rydall, Anne
    Rodin, Gary
    Tannock, Ian
    Donner, Allan
    Lo, Christopher
    [J]. LANCET, 2014, 383 (9930) : 1721 - 1730