Research Review: Language problems in children with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder - a systematic meta-analytic review

被引:84
作者
Korrel, Hannah [1 ,2 ]
Mueller, Kathryn L. [3 ]
Silk, Tim [1 ,4 ]
Anderson, Vicki [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Sciberras, Emma [1 ,4 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Psychol Sci, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Iowa, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Iowa City, IA USA
[4] Univ Melbourne, Dept Paediat, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[5] Royal Childrens Hosp, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[6] Deakin Univ, Sch Psychol, Geelong, Vic, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder; language; attention; language disorder; DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER; WORKING-MEMORY; STORY COMPREHENSION; PUBLICATION BIAS; IMPAIRMENT; ADHD; PROFILES; DYSLEXIA; SLI; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1111/jcpp.12688
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
BackgroundChildren with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) appear to have a higher risk of language problems compared with typically developing children, although the types of language problems experienced are less clear. This review aims to establish the types of language problems experienced by children with ADHD according to systematically reviewed literature and determine the empirical evidence for language problems in children with ADHD compared with non-ADHD controls. MethodsA standardized search protocol was used on databases: CINAHL, Medline, and PsychINFO. We identified studies with the following inclusion criteria: (a) confirmed ADHD status at the time of the study, (b) inclusion of a non-ADHD control group, (c) use of a validated language measure, and (d) age18. t-Tests, Pearson's r, and Hedges g effect sizes (ES) were calculated using summary statistics. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted for the language domain suitable for analysis. Publication bias was investigated using both the trim and fill and p-curve techniques. ResultsTwenty-one studies were included in the systematic review (ADHD=1,209; Control=1,101), within which 60 of 68 separate analyses found significant differences between the ADHD and control group on the language measures (p<.05). Follow-up meta-analyses found evidence for large deficits in the ADHD groups overall (10/11 studies met p<.05; weighted mean ES [WMES]: 1.04); expressive (10/10 met p<.05; WMES: 1.23); receptive (12/14 met p<.05; WMES: 0.97), and pragmatic language (4/4 studies met p<.05; WMES: 0.98) compared with controls. ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that children with ADHD have poorer performance on measures of overall, expressive, receptive, and pragmatic language compared with controls. A screening of language functioning may be a valuable addition to the assessment of ADHD.
引用
收藏
页码:640 / 654
页数:15
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, INT J CONT PEDIAT, DOI DOI 10.18203/2349-3291.IJCP20160836
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, PLOS ONE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, ADHD REP
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1985, Statistical method for meta-analysis
[5]  
[Anonymous], DEV LANGUAGE
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2000, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425787
[7]  
[Anonymous], ROLE GENRE PSYCHOLIN
[8]  
Baker I., 1992, COMPREHENSIVE MENTAL, V1, P3
[9]  
Barkley RA, 2015, ATTENTION-DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER IN ADULTS AND CHILDREN, P53
[10]   PREVALENCE OF PSYCHIATRIC-DISORDERS IN CHILDREN WITH SPEECH AND LANGUAGE DISORDERS [J].
BEITCHMAN, JH ;
NAIR, R ;
CLEGG, M ;
FERGUSON, B ;
PATEL, PG .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 1986, 25 (04) :528-535