ERP 'old/new' effects: memory strength and decisional factor(s)

被引:172
作者
Finnigan, S [1 ]
Humphreys, MS
Dennis, S
Geffen, G
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Psychol, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, ARC Key Ctr Human Factors & Appl Cognit Psychol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Cognit Psychophysiol Lab, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
recognition; N400; LPC; single-process models; familiarity; recollection;
D O I
10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00113-6
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while subjects made old/new recognition judgments on new unstudied words and old words which had been presented at study either once ('weak') or three times ('strong'). The probability of an 'old' response was significantly higher for strong than weak words and significantly higher for weak than new words. Comparisons were made initially between ERPs to new, weak and strong words, and subsequently between ERPs associated with six strength-by-response conditions. The N400 component was found to be modulated by memory trace strength in a graded manner. Its amplitude was most negative in new word ERPs and most positive in strong word ERPs. This 'N400 strength effect' was largest at the left parietal electrode (in ear-referenced ERPs). The amplitude of the late positive complex (LPC) effect was sensitive to decision accuracy (and perhaps confidence). Its amplitude was larger in ERPs evoked by words attracting correct versus incorrect recognition decisions. The LPC effect had a left > right, centro-parietal scalp topography (in ear-referenced ERPs). Hence, whereas, the majority of previous ERP studies of episodic recognition have interpreted results from the perspective of dual-process models, we provide alternative interpretations of N400 and LPC old/new effects in terms of memory strength and decisional factor(s). (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2288 / 2304
页数:17
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Electrophysiological evidence for dissociable processes contributing to recollection [J].
Allan, K ;
Wilding, EL ;
Rugg, MD .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1998, 98 (2-3) :231-252
[2]   An event-related potential study of explicit memory on tests of cued recall and recognition [J].
Allan, K ;
Rugg, MD .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1997, 35 (04) :387-397
[3]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[4]  
BENTIN S, 1990, B PSYCHONOMIC SOC, V28, P346
[5]   THE CONTRIBUTION OF TASK-RELATED FACTORS TO ERP REPETITION EFFECTS AT SHORT AND LONG LAGS [J].
BENTIN, S ;
PELED, BS .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1990, 18 (04) :359-366
[6]   MEMORY WITH AND WITHOUT AWARENESS - PERFORMANCE AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE OF SAVINGS [J].
BENTIN, S ;
MOSCOVITCH, M ;
HETH, I .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1992, 18 (06) :1270-1283
[7]   Brain potentials reflect behavioral differences in true and false recognition [J].
Curran, T ;
Schacter, DL ;
Johnson, MK ;
Spinks, R .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 13 (02) :201-216
[8]   Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity [J].
Curran, T .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2000, 28 (06) :923-938
[9]   The electrophysiology of incidental and intentional retrieval: ERP old new effects in lexical decision and recognition memory [J].
Curran, T .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1999, 37 (07) :771-785
[10]  
DENNI SS, 1995, SYDNEY MORN HERALD, P1