Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Semaglutide 1 mg Versus Empagliflozin 25 mg for Treatment of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in the UK Setting

被引:24
作者
Capehorn, Matthew [1 ]
Hallen, Nino [2 ]
Baker-Knight, James [2 ]
Glah, Divina [3 ]
Hunt, Barnaby [4 ]
机构
[1] Rotherham Inst Obes, Rotherham, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Novo Nordisk AS, Soborg, Denmark
[3] Novo Nordisk Ltd, Gatwick, England
[4] Ossian Hlth Econ & Commun, Basel, Switzerland
关键词
Cost-effectiveness; Cost-utility; Diabetes mellitus; Empagliflozin; GLP-1 receptor agonist; Semaglutide; SGLT2; inhibitor; United Kingdom; HEALTH-RELATED UTILITY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; IMPACT; VALUES; COMPLICATIONS; HYPOGLYCEMIA; VALIDATION; OUTCOMES; PEOPLE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s13300-020-00989-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Type 2 diabetes represents a continuing healthcare challenge, and choosing cost-effective treatments is crucial to ensure that healthcare resources are used efficiently. The present analysis assessed the cost-effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide 1 mg versus empagliflozin 25 mg for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequate glycaemic control on metformin monotherapy from a healthcare payer perspective in the UK. Methods: Outcomes were projected over patient lifetimes using the IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model. Baseline cohort characteristics and treatment effects of initiation of once-weekly semaglutide 1 mg and empagliflozin 25 mg were based on an indirect comparison conducted using patient-level data, as there is currently no head-to-head clinical trial comparing these therapies. Modelled patients received treatments until glycated haemoglobin exceeded 7.5% (58 mmol/mol), at which point patients initiated basal insulin. The analysis captured pharmacy costs and costs of diabetes-related complications, expressed in 2019 pounds sterling (GBP). Projected outcomes were discounted at 3.5% annually. Scenario analyses were prepared to assess uncertainty around projected outcomes. Results: Once-weekly semaglutide 1 mg was associated with increases in life expectancy and quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.12 years and 0.23 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), respectively, compared with empagliflozin 25 mg. Projected improvements in quality and duration of life resulted from a reduced cumulative incidence and a delayed time to onset of diabetes-related complications. Once-weekly semaglutide was associated with increased pharmacy costs, but this was partially offset by avoided costs of treating complications. Once-weekly semaglutide was associated with an increase in costs of GBP 1017 per patient, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of GBP 4439 per QALY gained. Conclusion: Once-weekly semaglutide 1 mg was projected to be a cost-effective treatment option from a healthcare payer perspective compared with empagliflozin 25 mg for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes in the UK setting.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 555
页数:19
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   The impact of diabetes-related complications on healthcare costs: new results from the UKPDS (UKPDS 84) [J].
Alva, M. L. ;
Gray, A. ;
Mihaylova, B. ;
Leal, J. ;
Holman, R. R. .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2015, 32 (04) :459-466
[2]  
[Anonymous], TYP 2 DIAB AD MAN NG
[3]   Modelling EuroQol health-related utility values for diabetic complications from CODE-2 data [J].
Bagust, A ;
Beale, S .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2005, 14 (03) :217-230
[4]   Oral Semaglutide Versus Empagliflozin, Sitagliptin and Liraglutide in the UK: Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Analyses Based on the PIONEER Clinical Trial Programme [J].
Bain, Stephen C. ;
Hansen, Brian B. ;
Malkin, Samuel J. P. ;
Nuhoho, Solomon ;
Valentine, William J. ;
Chubb, Barrie ;
Hunt, Barnaby ;
Capehorn, Matthew .
DIABETES THERAPY, 2020, 11 (01) :259-277
[5]   Review of Utility Values for Economic Modeling in Type 2 Diabetes [J].
Beaudet, Amelie ;
Clegg, John ;
Thuresson, Per-Olof ;
Lloyd, Adam ;
McEwan, Phil .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (04) :462-470
[6]   THE COST OF NON-SEVERE HYPOGLYCAEMIA IN EUROPE [J].
Chubb, B. ;
Tikkanen, C. .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (07) :A611-A611
[7]   Estimating utility values for health states of type 2 diabetic patients using the EQ-5D (UKPDS 62) [J].
Clarke, P ;
Gray, A ;
Holman, R .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2002, 22 (04) :340-349
[8]   Multivariate models of health-related utility and the fear of hypoglycaemia in people with diabetes [J].
Currie, Craig J. ;
Morgan, Christopher Ll. ;
Poole, Chris D. ;
Sharplin, Peter ;
Lammert, Morten ;
McEwan, Phil .
CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2006, 22 (08) :1523-1534
[9]  
Curtis L, 2018, Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2018, DOI DOI 10.22024/UNIKENT/01.02.70995
[10]  
Davies MJ, 2018, DIABETOLOGIA, V61, P2461, DOI [10.1007/s00125-018-4729-5, 10.2337/dci18-0033]