Integrated Testing Strategies for Use with Respect to the Requirements of the EU REACH Legislation

被引:5
作者
Grindon, Christina [1 ]
Combes, Robert
Cronin, Mark T. D. [2 ]
RobertS, David W. [2 ]
Garrod, John F. [3 ]
机构
[1] FRAME, Russell & Burch House, Nottingham, England
[2] Liverpool John Moores Univ, Sch Pharm & Chem, Liverpool L3 5UX, Merseyside, England
[3] Defra, Chem & Nanotechnol Div, London, England
来源
ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS | 2008年 / 36卷
关键词
animal testing; decision-trees; Defra; in silico models; integrated testing strategies; in vitro testing; REACH; risk assessment; Three Rs;
D O I
10.1177/026119290803601s03
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Integrated testing strategies have been proposed to facilitate the process of chemicals risk assessment to fulfil the requirements of the proposed EU REACH system. Here, we present individual, decision-tree style, strategies for the eleven major toxicity endpoints of the REACH system, including human health effects and ecotoxicity. These strategies make maximum use of non-animal approaches to hazard identification, before resorting to traditional animal test methods. Each scheme: a) comprises a mixture of validated and non-validated assays (distinguished in the schemes); and b) decision points at key stages to allow the cessation of further testing, should it be possible to use the available information to classify and label and/or undertake risk assessment. The rationale and scientific justification for each of the schemes, with respect to the validation status of the tests involved and their individual advantages and limitations, will be discussed in detail in a series of future publications.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 27
页数:21
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Balls M., 2002, ATLA S1, V30, P1
[2]  
Balls M., 2005, ALTEX, V22, P288
[3]   Toxicity testing: creating a revolution based on new technologies [J].
Bhogal, N ;
Grindon, C ;
Combes, R ;
Balls, M .
TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2005, 23 (06) :299-307
[4]   Differing perspectives on the use of scientific evidence and the precautionary principle [J].
Burger, J .
PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY, 2003, 75 (11-12) :2543-2545
[5]   Metabolism:: A bottleneck in in vitro toxicological test development -: The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 54 [J].
Coecke, S ;
Ahr, H ;
Blaauboer, BJ ;
Bremer, S ;
Casati, S ;
Castell, J ;
Combes, R ;
Corvi, R ;
Crespi, CL ;
Cunningham, ML ;
Elaut, G ;
Eletti, B ;
Freidig, A ;
Gennari, A ;
Ghersi-Egea, JF ;
Guillouzo, A ;
Hartung, T ;
Hoet, P ;
Ingelman-Sundberg, M ;
Munn, S ;
Janssens, W ;
Ladstetter, B ;
Leahy, D ;
Long, A ;
Meneguz, A ;
Monshouwer, M ;
Morath, S ;
Nagelkerke, F ;
Pelkonen, O ;
Ponti, J ;
Prieto, P ;
Richert, L ;
Sabbioni, E ;
Schaack, B ;
Steiling, W ;
Testai, E ;
Vericat, JA ;
Worth, A .
ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2006, 34 (01) :49-84
[6]   Intelligent testing strategies for chemicals testing - A case of more haste, less speed? [J].
Combes, R ;
Balls, M .
ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2005, 33 (03) :289-297
[7]   An assessment of progress in the use of alternatives in toxicity testing since the publication of the report of the second FRAME Toxicity Committee (1991) [J].
Combes, R ;
Balls, M ;
Bansil, L ;
Barratt, M ;
Bell, D ;
Botham, P ;
Broadhead, C ;
Clothier, R ;
George, E ;
Fentem, J ;
Jackson, M ;
Indans, I ;
Loizou, G ;
Navaratnam, V ;
Pentreath, V ;
Phillips, B ;
Stemplewski, H ;
Stewart, J .
ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2002, 30 (04) :365-406
[8]   An overall strategy for the testing of chemicals for human hazard and risk assessment under the EU REACH system [J].
Combes, R ;
Barratt, M ;
Balls, M .
ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2003, 31 (01) :7-19
[9]   Assessing risk to humans from chemical exposure by using non-animal test data [J].
Combes, RD .
TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 2005, 19 (07) :921-924
[10]   A scientific and animal welfare assessment of the OECD Health Effects Test Guidelines for the safety testing of chemicals under the European Union REACH system [J].
Combes, RD ;
Gaunt, I ;
Balls, M .
ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2004, 32 (03) :163-208