You spin me right round: cross-relationship variability in interpersonal emotion regulation

被引:41
作者
Niven, Karen [1 ]
Macdonald, Ian [2 ]
Holman, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Manchester Business Sch, Manchester M15 6PB, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Sheffield, Dept Psychol, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
interpersonal emotion regulation; emotion regulation; interpersonal behavior; spin; relationships; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; ATTACHMENT STYLE; SOCIAL-INFLUENCE; PERSONALITY; STRATEGIES; EXPERIENCE; MANAGEMENT; FEELINGS; QUALITY; EMPATHY;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00394
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Individuals use a range of interpersonal emotion regulation strategies to influence the feelings of others, e.g., friends, family members, romantic partners, work colleagues. But little is known about whether people vary their strategy use across these different relational contexts. We characterize and measure this variability as "spin," i.e., the extent of dispersion in a person's interpersonal emotion regulation strategy use across different relationships, and focus on two key questions. First, is spin adaptive or maladaptive with regard to personal well-being and relationship quality? Second, do personality traits that are considered important for interpersonal functioning (i.e., empathy, attachment style) predict spin? The data used in this study is drawn from a large online survey. A key contribution of this study is to reveal that people who varied the type of strategies they used across relationships (i.e., those with high spin) had lower positive mood, higher emotional exhaustion, and less close relationships. A further key contribution is to show that spin was associated with low empathic concern and perspective taking and high anxious attachment style. High variability in interpersonal emotion regulation strategies across relationships therefore appears to be maladaptive both personally and socially.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
[2]   INCLUSION OF OTHER IN THE SELF SCALE AND THE STRUCTURE OF INTERPERSONAL CLOSENESS [J].
ARON, A ;
ARON, EN ;
SMOLLAN, D .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 63 (04) :596-612
[3]   On the relative effectiveness of affect regulation strategies: A meta-analysis [J].
Augustine, Adam A. ;
Hemenover, Scott H. .
COGNITION & EMOTION, 2009, 23 (06) :1181-1220
[4]  
Brennan K. A., 1998, Attachment theory and close relationships, P46, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.PAIN.2006.07.020
[5]   MANAGING EMOTIONS IN PUBLIC - THE CASE OF WHEELCHAIR USERS [J].
CAHILL, SE ;
EGGLESTON, R .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 1994, 57 (04) :300-312
[6]  
Côté S, 2005, ACAD MANAGE REV, V30, P509, DOI [10.2307/20159142, 10.5465/amr.2005.17293692]
[7]   Social Relationships and Intraindividual Variability in Interpersonal Behavior: Correlates of Interpersonal Spin [J].
Cote, Stephane ;
Moskowitz, D. S. ;
Zuroff, David C. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 102 (03) :646-659
[8]   MEASURING INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN EMPATHY - EVIDENCE FOR A MULTIDIMENSIONAL APPROACH [J].
DAVIS, MH .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 44 (01) :113-126
[9]   GOALS IN SOCIAL INFORMATION-PROCESSING - THE CASE OF ANTICIPATED INTERACTION [J].
DEVINE, PG ;
SEDIKIDES, C ;
FUHRMAN, RW .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 56 (05) :680-690
[10]   Customer-related social stressors and burnout [J].
Dormann, Christian ;
Zapf, Dieter .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 9 (01) :61-82