Promoting students' cross-disciplinary performance and higher order thinking: a peer assessment-facilitated STEM approach in a mathematics course

被引:30
作者
Chang, Di [1 ]
Hwang, Gwo-Jen [1 ]
Chang, Shao-Chen [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Sheng-Yuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, Grad Inst Digital Learning & Educ, 43,Sec 4,Keelung Rd, Taipei 106, Taiwan
[2] Yuan Ze Univ, Dept Int Bachelor Program Informat, 135 Yuan Tung Rd, Taoyuan 330, Taiwan
[3] Yuan Ze Univ, Dept Informat Commun, 135 Yuan Tung Rd, Taoyuan 330, Taiwan
来源
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT | 2021年 / 69卷 / 06期
关键词
STEM education; Peer assessment; Higher order thinking; Evaluation methodologies; Interdisciplinary projects; EDUCATION; DESIGN; FEEDBACK; IMPACT; METAANALYSIS; PERCEPTIONS; MOTIVATION; FRAMEWORK; SCIENCE; METACOGNITION;
D O I
10.1007/s11423-021-10062-z
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) refers to the cross-disciplinary learning design for engaging students in applying integrated knowledge to complete a project or solve a complex problem. It has been recognized by many scholars for its educational significance. However, STEM tasks are generally complex and challenging to students. Without proper supports, not only will students' participation decrease, but their knowledge level and internal capabilities will also hardly improve. To help students understand teachers' rating standards, increase the opportunity to observe and receive feedback on peers' work, and improve their cognitive level and higher order thinking such as critical thinking, this study proposes a peer assessment-facilitated STEM (PA-STEM) approach. At the same time, a quasi-experiment was conducted in a junior high school in Taiwan to verify the effectiveness of this approach. A total of four classes of 112 students participated in the experiment. The experimental group (two classes with 53 students) learning with the PA-STEM approach, and the control group (two classes with 59 students) used the conventional STEM approach. The experimental results showed that the students in the experimental group had higher learning achievement. Their collaboration tendency, critical thinking awareness, problem-solving tendency, and meta-cognition tendency were all significantly better than those of the students in the control group. Besides, peer assessment scores were highly correlated with teacher assessment scores, indicating that students were able to fully understand teachers' rating standards and provide accurate ratings of their peers' STEM work.
引用
收藏
页码:3281 / 3306
页数:26
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]   Problem-based learning, self- and peer assessment in higher education: towards advancing lifelong learning skills [J].
Alt, Dorit ;
Raichel, Nirit .
RESEARCH PAPERS IN EDUCATION, 2022, 37 (03) :370-394
[2]   Developing young children's computational thinking with educational robotics: An interaction effect between gender and scaffolding strategy [J].
Angeli, Charoula ;
Valanides, Nicos .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2020, 105
[3]   Development and Validation of a STEM Competencies Assessment Framework [J].
Arikan, Serkan ;
Erktin, Emine ;
Pesen, Melek .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, 2022, 20 (01) :1-24
[4]   Use of weblogs to enhance group learning and design creativity amongst students at a Thai University [J].
Auttawutikul, Siwanit ;
Wiwitkunkasem, Kasemrut ;
Smith, Duncan R. .
INNOVATIONS IN EDUCATION AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 51 (04) :378-388
[5]   Correlations between modes of student cognitive engagement and instructional practices in undergraduate STEM courses [J].
Barlow, Allyson ;
Brown, Shane .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STEM EDUCATION, 2020, 7 (01)
[6]   Understanding STEM Education and Supporting Students Through Universal Design for Learning [J].
Basham, James D. ;
Marino, Matthew T. .
TEACHING EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 2013, 45 (04) :8-15
[7]  
Bédard D, 2010, INT J ENG EDUC, V26, P511
[8]   Synthesizing Results From Empirical Research on Computer-Based Scaffolding in STEM Education: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Belland, Brian R. ;
Walker, Andrew E. ;
Kim, Nam Ju ;
Lefler, Mason .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2017, 87 (02) :309-344
[9]   Formative assessment: a critical review [J].
Bennett, Randy .
ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION-PRINCIPLES POLICY & PRACTICE, 2011, 18 (01) :5-25
[10]  
Bicer A, 2017, PROC FRONT EDUC CONF