Chest X-ray sensitivity and lung cancer outcomes: a retrospective observational study

被引:26
作者
Bradley, Stephen H. [1 ]
Bhartia, Bobby Sk [2 ]
Callister, Matthew Ej [2 ]
Hamilton, William T. [3 ]
Hatton, Nathaniel Luke Fielding [2 ]
Kennedy, Martyn Pt [2 ]
Mounce, Luke Ta [4 ]
Shinkins, Bethany [5 ]
Wheatstone, Pete [6 ]
Neal, Richard D. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Leeds Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Exeter, Coll Med & Hlth, Primary Care Diagnost, Exeter, Devon, England
[4] Univ Exeter, Coll Med & Hlth, Exeter, Devon, England
[5] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Test Evaluat Grp, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[6] Univ Leeds, Co Acad Unit Primary Care, CanTest Collaborat, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[7] Univ Leeds, Acad Unit Primary Care, Primary Care Oncol, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
chest X-ray; early diagnosis; general practice; lung cancer; radiograph; test accuracy; PRIMARY-CARE; NATURAL-HISTORY; EARLY DEATH; DIAGNOSIS; TIME;
D O I
10.3399/BJGP.2020.1099
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Chest X-ray (CXR) is the first-line investigation for lung cancer in many healthcare systems. An understanding of the consequences of false negative CXRs on time to diagnosis, stage, and survival is limited. Aim To determine the sensitivity of CXR for lung cancer and to compare stage at diagnosis, time to diagnosis, and survival between those with CXR that detected, or did not detect, lung cancer. Design and setting Retrospective observational study using routinely collected healthcare data. Method All patients diagnosed with lung cancer in Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust during 2008-2015 who had a GP-requested CXR in the year before diagnosis were categorised based on the result of the earliest CXR performed in that period. The sensitivity of CXR was calculated and analyses were performed with respect to time to diagnosis, survival, and stage at diagnosis. Results CXR was negative for 17.7% of patients (n = 376/2129). Median time from initial CXR to diagnosis was 43 days for those with a positive CXR and 204 days for those with a negative CXR. Of those with a positive CXR, 29.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 27.9% to 31.8%) were diagnosed at stage I or II, compared with 33.5% (95% CI = 28.8% to 38.6%) with a negative CXR. Conclusion GPs should consider lung cancer in patients with persistent symptoms even when CXR is negative. Despite longer duration to diagnosis for those with false-negative CXRs, there was no evidence of an adverse impact on stage at diagnosis or survival; however, this comparison is likely to be affected by confounding variables.
引用
收藏
页码:E862 / E868
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[21]   Response to: What characteristics of primary care and patients are associated with early death in patients with lung cancer in the UK? [J].
Rogers, Trevor K. ;
Hamilton, William ;
Tod, Angela ;
Neal, Richard .
THORAX, 2015, 70 (02) :184-184
[22]   Minimising diagnostic delay in lung cancer [J].
Rogers, Trevor Keith .
THORAX, 2019, 74 (04) :319-320
[23]  
Royal College of Physicians, 2018, National Lung Cancer Audit annual report 2017 (for the audit period 2016)
[24]  
Royal College of Radiologists, 2019, MISS LUNG CANC CHEST
[25]  
Stapley S, 2006, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V56, P570
[26]  
Tabachnick, 2013, Using multivariate statistics, V6th
[27]   Lung Cancer Detectability by Test, Histology, Stage, and Gender: Estimates from the NLST and the PLCO Trials [J].
ten Haaf, Kevin ;
van Rosmalen, Joost ;
de Koning, Harry J. .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2015, 24 (01) :154-161
[28]   Evidence of increasing mortality with longer diagnostic intervals for five common cancers: A cohort study in primary care [J].
Torring, Marie Louise ;
Frydenberg, Morten ;
Hansen, Rikke P. ;
Olesen, Frede ;
Vedsted, Peter .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 (09) :2187-2198
[29]   Early diagnosis of lung cancer: is rapid access CT scanning the answer? [J].
Tsiakkis, Demetris ;
Graham, Yitka ;
Cox, Julie .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2019, 69 (679) :90-91
[30]   Misinterpretation of the chest x ray as a factor in the delayed diagnosis of lung cancer [J].
Turkington, PM ;
Kennan, N ;
Greenstone, MA .
POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 78 (917) :158-160