Evaluation of restoration techniques for the succulent Karoo, South Africa

被引:28
作者
Beukes, PC
Cowling, RM
机构
[1] Cape Technikon, Dept Nat Conservat & Oceanog, ZA-8000 Cape Town, South Africa
[2] Univ Cape Town, Dept Bot, Inst Plant Conservat, ZA-7701 Rondebosch, South Africa
关键词
bare areas; gypsum; infiltration; organic mulch; reseeding; restoration; South Africa; Succulent Karoo;
D O I
10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.00192.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Possible constraints on the passive recovery of bare areas in the Karoo, a semiarid region in South Africa, include inadequate supply of seed, availability of suitable microsites for plant establishment, altered soil properties, and the truncation of key soil biotic processes. Here we investigate the possibility of initiating the restoration of bare areas by soil surface treatments with gypsum (CaSO4 ) and/or organic mulch. We also apply an exogenous seed source to test the hypothesis that seed availability limits autogenic recovery. Both gypsum and mulch improved rain water infiltration, gypsum more so than mulch, and both treatments resulted in significantly higher numbers of reseeded seedlings compared with controls. Gypsum also improved the survival of the cohorts of seedlings of the larger seeded Tripteris sinuata . Tripteris showed the highest number of seedlings (maximum count of 150 seedlings/1,000 viable seeds sown) and surviving plants of the three reseeded species, which included two small-seeded species, Ruschia spinosa and Chaetobromus dregeanus . Throughout the study period significantly higher plant volumes of naturally seeded annuals and perennials were recorded in the gypsum and/or mulch treatments compared with the controls. Germination and emergence of reseeded and naturally seeded plants appears to be determined by the availability of cool season (autumn to spring ) soil moisture, whereas follow-up rainfall during this time is important for plant survival. Mulching of bare areas in the Succulent Karoo has the potential to re-create vegetated areas that will further capture and conserve water, soil, and nutrients. Gypsum also showed positive results but might not be a cost-effective option because of transport costs to these remote arid areas.
引用
收藏
页码:308 / 316
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] ABUSUWAR AO, 1995, RANGE MANAGEMENT ARI, P271
  • [2] Acocks JPH., 1975, Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa, V40, P1
  • [3] COMPETITION AND FACILITATION IN THE RECRUITMENT OF SEEDLINGS IN PATAGONIAN STEPPE
    AGUIAR, MR
    SORIANO, A
    SALA, OE
    [J]. FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 1992, 6 (01) : 66 - 70
  • [4] PERSPECTIVES AND PROCESSES IN REVEGETATION OF ARID AND SEMIARID RANGELANDS
    CALL, CA
    ROUNDY, BA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 1991, 44 (06): : 543 - 549
  • [5] Desmet P.G., 1999, KAROO ECOLOGICAL PAT, P3
  • [6] Ellis F., 1986, The Karoo biome: a preliminary synthesis Part 1 - physical environment, P18
  • [7] ELSHORBAGY MA, 1995, RANGE MANAGEMENT ARI, P251
  • [8] ESLER JE, 1993, THESIS U CAPE TOWN S
  • [9] THE SIGNIFICANCE OF (SURFACE) PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL-PROPERTIES IN DETERMINING SOIL SURFACE CONDITION OF RED EARTHS IN RANGELANDS
    GREENE, RSB
    TONGWAY, DJ
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 1989, 27 (01): : 213 - 225
  • [10] GUTTERMAN Y, 1981, DEV ARID ZONE ECOLOG, P35