Higher rates of sex evolve in spatially heterogeneous environments

被引:103
作者
Becks, Lutz [1 ,2 ]
Agrawal, Aneil F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Toronto, ON M5S 3B2, Canada
[2] Univ Cologne, Ctr Biol Sci, Inst Zool, Dept Gen Ecol, D-50931 Cologne, Germany
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
DELETERIOUS MUTATIONS; RECOMBINATION; SELECTION; EVOLUTION; ADVANTAGE; INCREASES;
D O I
10.1038/nature09449
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The evolution and maintenance of sexual reproduction has puzzled biologists for decades(1,2). Although this field is rich in hypotheses(3-5), experimental evidence is scarce. Some important experiments have demonstrated differences in evolutionary rates between sexual and asexual populations(6-8); other experiments have documented evolutionary changes in phenomena related to genetic mixing, such as recombination(9,10) and selfing(11). However, direct experiments of the evolution of sex within populations are extremely rare (but see ref. 12). Here we use the rotifer, Brachionus calyciflorus, which is capable of both sexual and asexual reproduction, to test recent theory(13-15) predicting that there is more opportunity for sex to evolve in spatially heterogeneous environments. Replicated experimental populations of rotifers were maintained in homogeneous environments, composed of either high-or low-quality food habitats, or in heterogeneous environments that consisted of a mix of the two habitats. For populations maintained in either type of homogeneous environment, the rate of sex evolves rapidly towards zero. In contrast, higher rates of sex evolve in populations experiencing spatially heterogeneous environments. The data indicate that the higher level of sex observed under heterogeneity is not due to sex being less costly or selection against sex being less efficient; rather sex is sufficiently advantageous in heterogeneous environments to overwhelm its inherent costs(2). Counter to some alternative theories(16,17) for the evolution of sex, there is no evidence that genetic drift plays any part in the evolution of sex in these populations.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / +
页数:5
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Evolution of sex: Why do organisms shuffle their genotypes? [J].
Agrawal, Aneil F. .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (17) :R696-R704
[2]   Spatial Heterogeneity and the Evolution of Sex in Diploids [J].
Agrawal, Aneil F. .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2009, 174 :S54-S70
[3]   DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SELECTION ON SEX VERSUS RECOMBINATION IN RED QUEEN MODELS WITH DIPLOID HOSTS [J].
Agrawal, Aneil F. .
EVOLUTION, 2009, 63 (08) :2131-2141
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, LME4 LINEAR MIXED EF
[5]  
Bell G., 1982, The masterpiece of nature: The evolution and genetics of sexuality
[6]   Sex releases the speed limit on evolution [J].
Colegrave, N .
NATURE, 2002, 420 (6916) :664-666
[7]   Population genetic perspectives on the evolution of recombination [J].
Feldman, MW ;
Otto, SP ;
Christiansen, FB .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF GENETICS, 1996, 30 :261-295
[8]   THEORETICAL POPULATION-GENETICS OF VARIABLE SELECTION AND MIGRATION [J].
FELSENSTEIN, J .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF GENETICS, 1976, 10 :253-280
[9]  
FELSENSTEIN J, 1976, GENETICS, V83, P845
[10]   Crossing the Hopf bifurcation in a live predator-prey system [J].
Fussmann, GF ;
Ellner, SP ;
Shertzer, KW ;
Hairston, NG .
SCIENCE, 2000, 290 (5495) :1358-1360