Reliability and validity of a cross-culturally adapted Hindi version of the SRS-22r questionnaire in Indian patients

被引:2
|
作者
Garg, Bhavuk [1 ]
Mehta, Nishank [1 ]
Swamy, Arun M. [1 ]
Kumar, Sunil [1 ]
Dixit, Vivek [1 ]
Gupta, Vivek [2 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Orthopaed, New Delhi 110029, India
[2] All India Inst Med Sci, Community Ophthalmol, New Delhi, India
关键词
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Cross-cultural adaptation; Health-related quality of life; Scoliosis; Spinal deformity; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; VALIDATION; INSTRUMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s43390-020-00106-4
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study designCross-sectional, observational.Objectives(i) To develop a cross-culturally adapted Hindi translation of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22r (refined) questionnaire and (ii) validate it in Hindi-speaking Indian patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).Background dataHealth-related quality of life (HRQoL)-based questionnaires have superseded objective clinical and radiological measurements as tools to assess the outcome of health-related interventions. The SRS-22r is an extensively validated HRQoL-based questionnaire for AIS patients and has been adapted and translated in other languages.MethodologyA Hindi version of SRS-22r was developed in accordance with standard guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation. The final Hindi version was administered to 108 AIS patients. Subsequently, 58/108 patients answered the Hindi version again after 10-14 days. Another 50/108 bilingual patients answered the original English version after 10-14 days. In addition, 52/108 patients answered a previously validated Hindi version of Short Form (SF)-36 health survey. Content analysis, floor/ceiling effects, internal consistency, test/retest reproducibility and concurrent validity with the English version and the SF-36 questionnaire were determined for the Hindi version of SRS-22r.ResultsHigh ceiling effect was noted for the pain and satisfaction with management domains of Hindi version of SRS-22r. Overall internal consistency was good (Cronbach alpha =0.77)-all domains, except the function domain (alpha =0.61) had good or excellent internal consistency. The test/retest reliability for all domains was excellent (intraclass coefficient/ICC>0.80). The concurrent validity with the English version showed an excellent correlation for all domains (ICC>0.80). Concurrent validity with SF-36 showed good correlation between relevant domains of SRS-22r and SF-36, except for the self-image and satisfaction with management domains of SRS-22r.ConclusionBased on the results proving its reliability and validity, the adapted Hindi version of SRS-22r can be effectively used in Hindi-speaking, Indian AIS patients.Level of evidence3
引用
收藏
页码:885 / 891
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reliability and validity of a cross-culturally adapted Hindi version of the SRS-22r questionnaire in Indian patients
    Bhavuk Garg
    Nishank Mehta
    Arun M Swamy
    Sunil Kumar
    Vivek Dixit
    Vivek Gupta
    Spine Deformity, 2020, 8 : 885 - 891
  • [2] The Brazilian version of the SRS-22r questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis
    Camarini, Paula M. F.
    Rosanova, Giselle C. L.
    Gabriel, Bruna S.
    Gianini, Priscila E. S.
    Oliveira, Anamaria S.
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2013, 17 (05) : 494 - 505
  • [3] Reliability and Validity of Adapted French Canadian Version of Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Questionnaire (SRS-22) in Quebec
    Beausejour, Marie
    Joncas, Julie
    Goulet, Lise
    Roy-Beaudry, Marjolaine
    Parent, Stefan
    Grimard, Guy
    Forcier, Martin
    Lauriault, Sophie
    Labelle, Hubert
    SPINE, 2009, 34 (06) : 623 - 628
  • [4] Reliability and Validity of the Swedish Version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22r) Patient Questionnaire for Idiopathic Scoliosis
    Danielsson, Aina J.
    Romberg, Karin
    SPINE, 2013, 38 (21) : 1875 - 1884
  • [5] Concurrent validity of the brazilian version of SRS-22r with Br-SF-36
    Rosanova, Giselle C. L.
    Gabriel, Bruna S.
    Camarini, Paula M. F.
    Gianini, Priscila E. S.
    Coelho, Daniel M.
    Oliveira, Anamaria S.
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2010, 14 (02) : 121 - 126
  • [6] Reliability and Validity of an Adapted Arabic Version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22r Questionnaire
    Haidar, Rachid K.
    Kassak, Kassem
    Masrouha, Karim
    Ibrahim, Kamal
    Mhaidli, Hani
    SPINE, 2015, 40 (17) : E971 - E977
  • [7] Reliability and validity of the adapted Dutch version of the revised Scoliosis Research Society 22-item questionnaire
    Schlosser, Tom P. C.
    Stadhouder, Agnita
    Schimmel, Janneke J. P.
    Lehr, A. Mechteld
    van der Heijden, Geert J. M. G.
    Castelein, Rene M.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 14 (08) : 1663 - 1672
  • [8] Development of the Italian Version of the Revised Scoliosis Research Society-22 Patient Questionnaire, SRS-22r-I Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Factor Analysis, Reliability, and Validity
    Monticone, Marco
    Baiardi, Paola
    Calabro, David
    Calabro, Fabio
    Foti, Calogero
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (24) : E1412 - E1417
  • [9] Reliability and validity of an adapted Saudi Arabic version of scoliosis research society outcomes questionnaire (SRS-30) in Saudi Arabia
    Alzakri, Abdulmajeed
    SPINE DEFORMITY, 2023, 11 (02) : 281 - 287
  • [10] Reliability and Validity Testing of a Danish Translated Version of the Scoliosis Research Society Instrument-22 Revised (SRS-22R)
    Simony A.
    Carreon L.Y.
    Andersen M.O.
    Spine Deformity, 2016, 4 (1) : 16 - 21