Evaluating the resilience of forest dependent communities in Central India by combining the sustainable livelihoods framework and the cross scale resilience analysis

被引:3
作者
Saxena, Alark [1 ]
Guneralp, Burak [2 ]
Bailis, Robert [3 ]
Yohe, Gary [4 ]
Oliver, Chadwick [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Forestry & Environm Studies, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, College Stn, TX 77840 USA
[3] Stockholm Environm Inst, US Ctr, Somerville, MA 02144 USA
[4] Wesleyan Univ, Middletown, CT 06459 USA
来源
CURRENT SCIENCE | 2016年 / 110卷 / 07期
关键词
Adaptation; central India; climate change; resilience; rural livelihood; SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS; RURAL LIVELIHOODS; VULNERABILITY; WATER; PERSPECTIVES; SURROGATES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Resilience has moved from being a peripheral ecological concept to a central goal, in the development discourse. While the concept has become popular, operationalizing resilience has been difficult. Many frameworks have been proposed to operationalize resilience but no common framework has been agreed upon. The present article demonstrates a step by step method to operationalize livelihood resilience analysis, for communities that are affected by climate change by taking the case of rural household livelihoods in villages around Ratapani Wildlife Sanctuary in Central India. The article combines the Sustainable Livelihood Framework (SLF) with the Cross Scale Resilience Analysis (CSRA), as a way to operationalize resilience. The CSRA is found to be simple, systematic and applicable in diverse contexts. The systematic and holistic asset, process and institution-based analysis under the SLF, supports the CSRA by defining the system and identifying associated important shocks that affect the system. Through the analysis, it was realized that the impact of shifts in government policies on rural livelihoods is much greater than the impacts of climate change. The livelihood is worst affected when the shift in government policies coincides with impacts of climate change. The article argues that combining the SLF with the CSRA can provide a standardized method for livelihood resilience analysis of poor natural-resource dependent communities in developing countries. Handling the dynamic nature of these complex adaptive social-ecological systems in the resilience analysis should be the next goal to tackle.
引用
收藏
页码:1195 / 1207
页数:13
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] Adger W. N., 2001, Journal of International Development, V13, P921, DOI 10.1002/jid.833
  • [2] Agrawal Arun., 2009, CONSERV SOC, V7, P1, DOI [10.4103/0972-4923.54790, DOI 10.4103/0972-4923.54790]
  • [3] Allison HE, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
  • [4] Anderies JM, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1999, SUST LIV GUID SHEETS
  • [6] Baumann P., 2009, Linking development with democratic processes in India: Political capital and sustainable livelihoods analysis
  • [7] Capitals and capabilities: A framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty
    Bebbington, A
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1999, 27 (12) : 2021 - 2044
  • [8] DEVELOPING A FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING RESILIENCE OF TOURISM SUB-SYSTEMS TO CLIMATIC FACTORS
    Becken, Susanne
    [J]. ANNALS OF TOURISM RESEARCH, 2013, 43 : 506 - 528
  • [9] Testing resilience thinking in a poverty context: Experience from the Niger River basin
    Bene, Christophe
    Evans, Louisa
    Mills, David
    Ovie, Solomon
    Raji, Aminu
    Tafida, Ahmadu
    Kodio, Amaga
    Sinaba, Famory
    Morand, Pierre
    Lemoalle, Jacques
    Andrew, Neil
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2011, 21 (04): : 1173 - 1184
  • [10] A systems model approach to determining resilience surrogates for case studies
    Bennett, EM
    Cumming, GS
    Peterson, GD
    [J]. ECOSYSTEMS, 2005, 8 (08) : 945 - 957