Sensitivity analysis of logistic regression parameterization for land use and land cover probability estimation

被引:31
作者
Van Dessel, Wim [1 ]
Van Rompaey, Anton [1 ]
Szilassi, Peter [2 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Phys & Reg Geog Res Grp, Heverlee, Belgium
[2] Univ Szeged, Dept Geog & Ecotourism, Szeged, Hungary
基金
匈牙利科学研究基金会;
关键词
data quality; land cover change; logistic regression; SOIL-EROSION; URBAN-GROWTH; ACCURACY; DYNAMICS; IMPACT; VALIDATION; LANDSCAPE; DISCOVER; MODELS; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1080/13658810903194256
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The recent availability of regional-scale land use and land cover data made it possible to apply land use and land cover models at regional-, national-and even continental-scale levels. A commonly used modelling approach is based on the assessment of land cover probabilities by means of logistic regression equations. In most cases, however, the error involved in the parameterization of logistic regression equations is not known. In this article, the sensitivity of logistic regression parameterization for land use and land cover probability assessments is analysed by comparing the results using input maps from different sources. Land cover maps with a range of accuracy levels were collected for a sub-catchment of the Lake Balaton watershed in Hungary. The results show that the parameterization of the logistic regression coefficients is highly dependent on the quality of the input maps. Both the spatial pattern and the area covered by a specific land cover type have a direct influence on the error propagation in the land cover probability maps. These findings should be taken into account when interpreting the results of land use and land cover change models at regional- and national-scale levels.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 507
页数:19
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1985, SAS User's Guide: Statistics.
[2]   The use of flow variability analysis to assess the impact of land use change on the paired Plynlimon catchments, mid-Wales [J].
Archer, David R. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2007, 347 (3-4) :487-496
[3]   Accuracy and congruency of three different digital land-use maps [J].
Bach, M. ;
Breuer, L. ;
Frede, H. G. ;
Huisman, J. A. ;
Otte, A. ;
Waldhardt, R. .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2006, 78 (04) :289-299
[4]  
BAKER W L, 1989, Landscape Ecology, V2, P111, DOI 10.1007/BF00137155
[5]  
Batty M., 1999, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, V23, P205, DOI 10.1016/S0198-9715(99)00015-0
[7]  
Brown D.G., 2004, LAND CHANGE SCI, P395, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4020-2562-423, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-2562-423, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-2562-4_23]
[8]  
Candau J., 2000, P 4 INT C INT GEOGR
[9]   THE ACCURACY OF MAP OVERLAYS - A REASSESSMENT [J].
CHRISMAN, NR .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 1987, 14 (05) :427-439
[10]   Loose-coupling a cellular automaton model and GIS: long-term urban growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore [J].
Clarke, KC ;
Gaydos, LJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 1998, 12 (07) :699-714