STOCHASTIC CAR-FOLLOWING MODEL FOR EXPLAINING NONLINEAR TRAFFIC PHENOMENA

被引:4
作者
Meng, Jianping [1 ]
Song, Tao [2 ]
Dong, Liyun [2 ]
Dai, Shiqiang [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Normal Univ, Coll Math Phys & Informat Engn, Jinhua 321004, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Univ, Shanghai Inst Appl Math & Mech, Shanghai Key Lab Mech Energy Engn, Shanghai 200072, Peoples R China
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS B | 2011年 / 25卷 / 08期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Traffic flow; car-following model; nonlinear traffic phenomena; DYNAMICAL MODEL; FLOW; PHASE; SIMULATION; SYSTEMS; PHYSICS; STATES; JAMS;
D O I
10.1142/S0217979211058419
中图分类号
O59 [应用物理学];
学科分类号
摘要
There is a common time parameter for representing the sensitivity or the lag (response) time of drivers in many car-following models. In the viewpoint of traffic psychology, this parameter could be considered as the perception-response time (PRT). Generally, this parameter is set to be a constant in previous models. However, PRT is actually not a constant but a random variable described by the lognormal distribution. Thus the probability can be naturally introduced into car-following models by recovering the probability of PRT. For demonstrating this idea, a specific stochastic model is constructed based on the optimal velocity model. By conducting simulations under periodic boundary conditions, it is found that some important traffic phenomena, such as the hysteresis and phantom traffic jams phenomena, can be reproduced more realistically. Especially, an interesting experimental feature of traffic jams, i.e., two moving jams propagating in parallel with constant speed stably and sustainably, is successfully captured by the present model.
引用
收藏
页码:1111 / 1120
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[21]   Metastable states in a microscopic model of traffic flow [J].
Krauss, S ;
Wagner, P ;
Gawron, C .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 1997, 55 (05) :5597-5602
[22]   Phase diagram of congested traffic flow: An empirical study [J].
Lee, HY ;
Lee, HW ;
Kim, D .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2000, 62 (04) :4737-4741
[23]   Long-lived states in synchronized traffic flow: Empirical prompt and dynamical trap model [J].
Lubashevsky, I ;
Mahnke, R ;
Wagner, P ;
Kalenkov, S .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2002, 66 (01)
[24]  
Meng JP, 2007, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NONLINEAR MECHANICS, P1067
[25]   The physics of traffic jams [J].
Nagatani, T .
REPORTS ON PROGRESS IN PHYSICS, 2002, 65 (09) :1331-1386
[26]   Density waves in traffic flow [J].
Nagatani, T .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2000, 61 (04) :3564-3570
[27]   AN OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS OF TRAFFIC DYNAMICS [J].
PIPES, LA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 1953, 24 (03) :274-281
[28]   Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations [J].
Treiber, M ;
Hennecke, A ;
Helbing, D .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2000, 62 (02) :1805-1824
[29]   Derivation, properties, and simulation of a gas-kinetic-based, nonlocal traffic model [J].
Treiber, M ;
Hennecke, A ;
Helbing, D .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 1999, 59 (01) :239-253