Quality of life and toxicity in breast cancer patients using adjuvant TAC (docetaxel, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide), in comparison with FAC (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil)

被引:21
作者
Hatam, N. [1 ]
Ahmadloo, N. [2 ]
Kiadaliri, A. Ahmad [3 ]
Bastani, P.
Askarian, M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Sch Management & Med Informat Sci, Shiraz, Iran
[2] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Namazi Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Shiraz, Iran
[3] Lund Univ, Ctr Primary Hlth Care Res, Div Hlth Econ, Lund, Sweden
[4] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Dept Community Med, Shiraz, Iran
关键词
Quality of life; Toxicity; Adjuvant therapy; Breast cancer;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-010-1609-8
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to compare two regimens of chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer, including FAC (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and 5-fluorouracil) and TAC (docetaxel, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide); and analyze the toxicity of these treatments and observe patient's health-related quality of life. Health-related quality of life was assessed for up to 4 months (from the beginning to the end of chemotherapy cycles), using European organization and cancer treatment quality of life questionnaire (EORTC) QLQ-C30. A group of 100 patients, with node-positive breast cancer were studied in order to compare the toxicity of adjuvant therapy TAC with FAC and the subsequent effects on the patient's quality of life. After a 4-month follow-up of patients, our findings showed that despite having the same mean score of QOL at the start of adjuvant chemotherapy, the QOL in TAC arm was decreased more as a result of the higher range of toxicity in TAC regimen. In spite of increase in disease-free patients who received TAC regimen and increase their survival rate, there is significant toxicity and decrease in QOL in TAC protocol compare to FAC protocol. Using prophylactic granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) along with increased education aimed at improving patient's knowledge and also the provision of a supportive group involving psychiatrics and patients that have successfully experienced the same treatment may be helpful.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 220
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
BOER K, 2003, PATHOL ONCOL RES, V9, P229
[2]   Cost-effectiveness analysis of breast cancer adjuvant treatment: FEC 50 versus FEC 100 (FASG05 study) [J].
Bonneterre, J ;
Bercez, C ;
Bonneterre, ME ;
Lenne, X ;
Dervaux, B .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2005, 16 (06) :915-922
[3]  
BRAIN GC, 2005, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V293, P2367
[4]  
BRINTON L, 2002, CANC BREAST, V2, P111
[5]  
Fayers P.M., 2001, On behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group. The EORTC QLQ-C30: Scoring Manual, V3rd
[6]  
HAJIAN S, 1998, IRANS BREAST DIS, V1, P32
[7]  
MANT D, 1991, BREAST COMPREHENSIVE, V116, P363
[8]   Toxicity and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant docetaxel, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide (TAC) or 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (FAC):: impact of adding primary prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to the TAC regimen [J].
Martin, M. ;
Lluch, A. ;
Segui, M. A. ;
Ruiz, A. ;
Ramos, M. ;
Adrover, E. ;
Roriguez-Lescure, A. ;
Grosse, R. ;
Calvo, L. ;
Fernandez-Chacon, C. ;
Roset, M. ;
Anton, A. ;
Isla, D. ;
Martinez del Prado, P. ;
Iglesias, L. ;
Zaluski, J. ;
Arcusa, A. ;
Loez-Vega, J. M. ;
Munoz, M. ;
Mel, J. R. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2006, 17 (08) :1205-1212
[9]   Life-threatening complications from doxorubicin-docetaxel chemotherapy for breast cancer [J].
Martin, M ;
Vogel, C ;
Crown, J ;
Mackey, J .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 294 (17) :2166-2166
[10]   Adjuvant docetaxel for node-positive breast cancer [J].
Martin, M ;
Pienkowski, T ;
Mackey, J ;
Pawlicki, M ;
Guastalla, JP ;
Weaver, C ;
Tomiak, E ;
Al-Tweigeri, T ;
Chap, L ;
Juhos, E ;
Guevin, R ;
Howell, A ;
Fornander, T ;
Hainsworth, J ;
Coleman, R ;
Vinholes, J ;
Modiano, M ;
Pinter, T ;
Tang, SC ;
Colwell, B ;
Prady, C ;
Provencher, L ;
Walde, D ;
Rodriguez-Lescure, A ;
Hugh, J ;
Loret, C ;
Rupin, M ;
Blitz, S ;
Jacobs, P ;
Murawsky, M ;
Riva, A ;
Vogel, C .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (22) :2302-2313