Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Abdomen at 3.0 Tesla: Image Quality and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Reproducibility Compared With 1.5 Tesla

被引:177
作者
Rosenkrantz, Andrew B. [1 ]
Oei, Marcel [1 ]
Babb, James S. [1 ]
Niver, Benjamin E. [1 ]
Taouli, Bachir [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU Langone Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Mt Sinai Sch Med, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
diffusion-weighted imaging; apparent diffusion coefficient; abdomen; liver; ADC reproducibility; RENAL LESIONS CHARACTERIZATION; CONTRAST-ENHANCED MRI; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; PRELIMINARY EXPERIENCE; INITIAL-EXPERIENCE; LIVER FIBROSIS; HEALTHY-VOLUNTEERS; CHRONIC HEPATITIS; ABDOMINAL ORGANS; FIELD-STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.22395
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare single-shot echo-planar imaging (SS EPI) diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) of abdominal organs between 1.5 Tesla (T) and 3.0T in healthy volunteers in terms of image quality, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, and ADC reproducibility. Materials and Methods: Eight healthy volunteers were prospectively imaged in this HIPAA-compliant IRB-approved study. Each subject underwent two consecutive scans at both 1.5 and 3.0T, which included breathhold and free-breathing DWI using a wide range of b-values (0 to 800 s/mm(2)). A blinded observer rated subjective image quality (maximum score= 8), and a separate observer placed regions of interest within the liver, renal cortices, pancreas, and spleen to measure ADC at each field strength. Paired Wilcoxon tests were used to compare abdominal DWI between 1.5T and 3.0T for specific combinations of organs, b-values, and acquisition techniques. Results: Subjective image quality was significantly lower at 3.0T for all comparisons (P = 0.0078- 0.0156). ADC values were similar at 1.5T and 3.0T for all assessed organs, except for lower liver ADC at 3.0T using b0-500-600 and breathhold technique. ADC reproducibility was moderate at both 1.5T and 3.0T, with no significant difference in coefficient of variation of ADC between field strengths. Conclusion: Compared with 1.5T, SS EPI at 3.0T provided generally similar ADC values, however, with worse image quality. Further optimization of abdominal DWI at 3.0T is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 135
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Abdominal MR Imaging at 3.0 T [J].
Akisik, Fatih M. ;
Sandrasegaran, Kumaresan ;
Aisen, Alex M. ;
Lin, Chen ;
Lall, Chandana .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2007, 27 (05) :1433-1444
[2]   Assessment of Chronic Pancreatitis: Utility of Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging with Secretin Enhancement [J].
Akisik, M. Fatih ;
Aisen, Alex M. ;
Sandrasegaran, Kumar ;
Jennings, S. Gregory ;
Lin, Chen ;
Sherman, Stuart ;
Lin, John A. ;
Rydberg, Magnus .
RADIOLOGY, 2009, 250 (01) :103-109
[3]   Radial fast spin-echo method for T2-weighted imaging and T2 mapping of the liver [J].
Altbach, MI ;
Outwater, EK ;
Trouard, TP ;
Krupinski, EA ;
Theilmann, RJ ;
Stopeck, AT ;
Kono, M ;
Gmitro, AF .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2002, 16 (02) :179-189
[4]   Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Cancer Biomarker: Consensus and Recommendations [J].
不详 .
NEOPLASIA, 2009, 11 (02) :102-125
[5]  
Aubé C, 2004, J RADIOL, V85, P301
[6]   Comparison of Physiological Triggering Schemes for Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Kidneys [J].
Binser, Tobias ;
Thoeny, Harriet C. ;
Eisenberger, Ute ;
Stemmer, Alto ;
Boesch, Chris ;
Vermathen, Peter .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2010, 31 (05) :1144-1150
[7]   Short- and Midterm Reproducibility of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements at 3.0-T Diffusion-weighted Imaging of the Abdomen [J].
Braithwaite, Adam C. ;
Dale, Brian M. ;
Boll, Daniel T. ;
Merkle, Elmar M. .
RADIOLOGY, 2009, 250 (02) :459-465
[8]   Evaluation of true diffusion, perfusion factor, and apparent diffusion coefficient in non-necrotic liver metastases and uncomplicated liver hemangiomas using black-blood echo planar imaging [J].
Coenegrachts, Kenneth ;
Delanote, Joost ;
ter Beek, Leon ;
Haspeslagh, Marc ;
Bipat, Shandra ;
Stoker, Jaap ;
Steyaert, Luc ;
Rigauts, Hans .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2009, 69 (01) :131-138
[9]   Apparent diffusion coefficient: Potential imaging biomarker for prediction and early detection of response to chemotherapy in hepatic metastases [J].
Cui, Yong ;
Zhang, Xiao-Peng ;
Sun, Ying-Shi ;
Tang, Lei ;
Shen, Lin .
RADIOLOGY, 2008, 248 (03) :894-900
[10]   Field Strength and Diffusion Encoding Technique Affect the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements in Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Abdomen [J].
Dale, Brian M. ;
Braithwaite, Adam C. ;
Boll, Daniel T. ;
Merkle, Elmar M. .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2010, 45 (02) :104-108