Improving quality of life for patients with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: early results

被引:0
作者
Puia, I. C. [1 ]
Cristea, P. G. [1 ]
Puia, V. R. [1 ]
Mocan, L. [1 ]
Mitre, C. [2 ]
Zdrehus, C. [2 ]
Ionescu, D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med & Farm Iuliu Hatieganu, Clin Chirurg 3, Cluj Napoca 400162, Romania
[2] Univ Med & Farm Iuliu Hatieganu, Clin ATI 1, Cluj Napoca 400162, Romania
关键词
obesity; laparoscopy; adjustable gastric banding; quality of life; BAROS; Moorehead-Ardelt QLQ II; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of the study was to evaluate the improvement in quality of life for patients that have undergone the laparoscopic gastric banding, using the BAROS and Moorehead-Ardelt II questionnaires. Methods: We selected a 20 patient group (65% women) that underwent this surgical procedure in our clinic. The initial average weight was 123.45kg, and the body-mass index of 42.36. The average age was 29.25 years. The pars flaccida technique was used in 18, and the perigastric approach in 2 cases. Results: No complications or intraoperative accidents occurred. The mean operation time was 115.5 minutes. Elective conversion was needed in one case with a BMI of 55. The average hospital stay was of 3.2 days. The follow-up was conducted at least through phone in 95% of cases, and its average duration was of 10 months. The only postoperative complications were infections of the subcutaneous port (5 cases - 25%) which needed removal of the port, but not of the banding. The average loss of excess weight was 48.23%. Using the BAROS score to determine the overall improvement of quality of life, 30% of the patients scored as "Very Good", 50% as "Good", 20% as "Fair". Using the Moorehead-Ardelt QLQ II score, 65% scored as "Very Good", 30% as "Good" and 5% as "Fair". Conclusion: The laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding significantly improves the quality of life for most patients with this procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 345
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Retrospective analysis of laparoscopic gastric banding technique: Short-term and mid-term follow-up
    Berrevoet, F
    Pattyn, P
    Cardon, A
    de Ryck, F
    Hesse, UJ
    de Hemptinne, B
    [J]. OBESITY SURGERY, 1999, 9 (03) : 272 - 275
  • [2] Avoiding complications after laparoscopic esophago-gastric banding: Experience with 400 consecutive patients
    Boschi, Sergio
    Fogli, Luciano
    Berta, Rossana Daniela
    Patrizi, Patrizio
    Di Domenico, Marco
    Vetere, Fernando
    Capizzi, Daniele
    Capizzi, Francesco Domenico
    [J]. OBESITY SURGERY, 2006, 16 (09) : 1166 - 1170
  • [3] Who benefits from gastric banding?
    Bueter, Marco
    Thalheimer, Andreas
    Lager, Caroline
    Schowalter, Marion
    Illert, Bertram
    Fein, Martin
    [J]. OBESITY SURGERY, 2007, 17 (12) : 1608 - 1613
  • [4] Copaescu C, 2007, Chirurgia (Bucur), V102, P447
  • [5] The technical approach in banding to avoid pouch dilatation
    Elias, B
    Staudt, JP
    Van Vyne, E
    [J]. OBESITY SURGERY, 2001, 11 (03) : 311 - 314
  • [6] LAPAROSCOPIC ADJUSTABLE SILICONE GASTRIC BANDING - TECHNIQUE AND RESULTS
    FAVRETTI, F
    CADIERE, GB
    SEGATO, G
    BRUYNS, G
    DEMARCH, F
    HIMPENS, J
    FOLETTO, M
    LISE, M
    [J]. OBESITY SURGERY, 1995, 5 (04) : 364 - 371
  • [7] Adjustable gastric banding: Advantages and disadvantages
    Lucchese, M
    Alessio, F
    Valeri, A
    Cantelli, G
    Venneri, F
    Borrelli, D
    [J]. OBESITY SURGERY, 1999, 9 (03) : 269 - 271
  • [8] The validation of the Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II
    Moorehead, MK
    Ardelt-Gattinger, E
    Lechner, H
    Oria, HE
    [J]. OBESITY SURGERY, 2003, 13 (05) : 684 - 692
  • [9] Injection port complications after gastric banding: Incidence, management and prevention
    Weiss, H
    Nehoda, H
    Labeck, B
    Hourmont, M
    Lanthaler, M
    Aigner, F
    [J]. OBESITY SURGERY, 2000, 10 (03) : 259 - 262
  • [10] Westgate, 1991, Obes Surg, V1, P287, DOI 10.1381/096089291765561015