Determinants of the Adoption of Green Building Simulation Technologies in Architectural Design Practices in Taiwan

被引:8
作者
Lin, Chuan-Hsuan [1 ]
Chih, Ying-Yi [2 ]
Tsay, Yaw-Shyan [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Dept Architecture, 1 Univ Rd, Tainan 701, Taiwan
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Coll Business & Econ, Res Sch Management, 26 Kingsley St, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia
关键词
Green building; Simulation; Technology adoption; Architectural design; CONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONALS ACCEPTANCE; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; MODEL; 3; EXTENSION; BIM; ANTECEDENTS; DEVICES; DRIVES;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002223
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Critical decisions about whether and how to integrate sustainability measures into the life cycle activities of green buildings are made in the early architectural design phase. To this end, researchers have advocated the use of various green building simulation technologies (GBSTs) to perform sustainability analyses to support integrated architectural design processes, cross-disciplinary communications, and evidence-based decision making. However, the adoption of GBSTs in architectural design practices remains limited. Building on the technology acceptance model, this paper investigates the determinants and mechanisms that influence the adoption of GBSTs in practice. Empirical data collected from architectural designers in Taiwan through qualitative interviews and a quantitative survey show that perceived usefulness is a strong predictor of designers' intentions to adopt GBSTs. Job relevance, result demonstrability, compatibility, and competitive advantage are also important determinants of GBST adoption. Practical recommendations are offered to encourage greater adoption of GBSTs in architectural design practices. Theoretically, this research extends the technology adoption literature in the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry by broadening and deepening the understanding of context-specific determinants of GBST adoption.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [21] Hair J. F., 2013, Multivariate data analysis
  • [22] Human behavior simulation in architectural design projects: An observational study in an academic course
    Hong, Seung Wan
    Schaumann, Davide
    Kalay, Yehuda E.
    [J]. COMPUTERS ENVIRONMENT AND URBAN SYSTEMS, 2016, 60 : 1 - 11
  • [23] Building simulation: Ten challenges
    Hong, Tianzhen
    Langevin, Jared
    Sun, Kaiyu
    [J]. BUILDING SIMULATION, 2018, 11 (05) : 871 - 898
  • [24] Comparative Study of BIM Acceptance between Korea and the United States
    Lee, Seulki
    Yu, Jungho
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 142 (03)
  • [25] BIM Acceptance Model in Construction Organizations
    Lee, Seulki
    Yu, Jungho
    Jeong, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2015, 31 (03)
  • [26] Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model
    Legris, P
    Ingham, J
    Collerette, P
    [J]. INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2003, 40 (03) : 191 - 204
  • [27] Extended Technology-Acceptance Model to Make Smart Construction Systems Successful
    Liu, Diandian
    Lu, Weisheng
    Niu, Yuhan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 144 (06)
  • [28] Modelling user acceptance of building management systems
    Lowry, G
    [J]. AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2002, 11 (06) : 695 - 705
  • [29] Building Information Modeling (BIM) for green buildings: A critical review and future directions
    Lu, Yujie
    Wu, Zhilei
    Chang, Ruidong
    Li, Yongkui
    [J]. AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2017, 83 : 134 - 148
  • [30] Miles M.B., 2014, Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, V3rd ed.