Ecosystem services in Swedish forests

被引:35
|
作者
Hansen, Karin [1 ]
Malmaeus, Mikael [1 ]
机构
[1] IVL Swedish Environm Res Inst, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Ecosystem services; Swedish forests; indicators; biophysical valuation; economic valuation; trade-offs; SOIL QUALITY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; MANAGEMENT; BIODIVERSITY; INDICATORS; VALUATION; BENEFITS; TOURISM; NORWAY;
D O I
10.1080/02827581.2016.1164888
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
We identify, describe qualitatively, quantify biophysically and, if possible, monetarily valuate the most important ecosystem services in Swedish forests. Existing Swedish and Nordic research and statistics within this area are reviewed and used to develop a first framework for the valuation of ecosystem services in Swedish forests. We base our analysis on the CICES framework and the Cascade-model. Despite the rather long occurrence and use of the concept of ecosystem services, we do not yet have enough information on the status and economic value of services in Swedish forests. The value of the forest ecosystem services is at best an indication of the different multifunctional objectives that should be met in the management of the Swedish forests. The five most central ecosystem services in Swedish forests according to annual flow are timber and pulpwood, bioenergy, game, climate regulation and recreation and training, each estimated to have a monetary value of several billion SEK. The different ecosystem services in multipurpose forests interact with each other and may lead to conflicts between use and conservation. We identified a number of trade-offs and synergies between services focusing on the five above ecosystem services.
引用
收藏
页码:626 / 640
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Management Strategy for Multiple Ecosystem Services in Boreal Forests
    Holm, Stig-Olof
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY, 2015, 34 (04) : 358 - 379
  • [42] Ecosystem Services of Mangrove Forests: Results of a Meta-Analysis of Economic Values
    Getzner, Michael
    Islam, Muhammad Shariful
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (16) : 1 - 13
  • [43] Spatiotemporal valuation of cultural and natural landscapes contributing to Pakistan's cultural ecosystem services
    Shedayi, Arshad Ali
    Xu, Ming
    Gonalez-Redin, Julen
    Ali, Amjad
    Shahzad, Laila
    Rahim, Sabit
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (27) : 41834 - 41848
  • [44] Evaluating the ecosystem services and benefits of wetland restoration by use of the rapid benefit indicators approach
    Mazzotta, Marisa
    Bousquin, Justin
    Berry, Walter
    Ojo, Claudette
    McKinney, Rick
    Hyckha, Kristen
    Druschke, Caroline Gottschalk
    INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 15 (01) : 148 - 159
  • [45] Hyrcanian forests conservation based on ecosystem services approach
    Zahra Asadolahi
    Abdolrassoul Salmanmahiny
    Yousef Sakieh
    Environmental Earth Sciences, 2017, 76
  • [46] Future trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services in Mediterranean forests under global change scenarios
    Moran-Ordonez, Alejandra
    Ameztegui, Aitor
    De Caceres, Miquel
    de-Miguel, Sergio
    Lefevre, Francois
    Brotons, Lluis
    Coll, Lluis
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2020, 45
  • [47] Payment for Ecosystem Services from Forests
    Alix-Garcia, Jennifer
    Wolff, Hendrik
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF RESOURCE ECONOMICS, VOL 6, 2014, 6 : 361 - 380
  • [48] Including stakeholders' perspectives on ecosystem services in multifunctionality assessments
    Hoelting, Lisanne
    Komossa, Franziska
    Filyushkina, Anna
    Gastinger, Miene-Marie
    Verburg, Peter H.
    Beckmann, Michael
    Volk, Martin
    Cord, Anna F.
    ECOSYSTEMS AND PEOPLE, 2020, 16 (01) : 354 - 368
  • [49] The value of cultural ecosystem services in a rural landscape context
    Csurgo, Bernadett
    Smith, Melanie K.
    JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2021, 86 : 76 - 86
  • [50] ECONOMIC VALUE OF ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN THE EASTERN ORE MOUNTAINS
    Vojacek, Ondrej
    Louda, Jiri
    E & M EKONOMIE A MANAGEMENT, 2017, 20 (03): : 4 - 18