Ecosystem services in Swedish forests

被引:35
|
作者
Hansen, Karin [1 ]
Malmaeus, Mikael [1 ]
机构
[1] IVL Swedish Environm Res Inst, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Ecosystem services; Swedish forests; indicators; biophysical valuation; economic valuation; trade-offs; SOIL QUALITY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; MANAGEMENT; BIODIVERSITY; INDICATORS; VALUATION; BENEFITS; TOURISM; NORWAY;
D O I
10.1080/02827581.2016.1164888
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
We identify, describe qualitatively, quantify biophysically and, if possible, monetarily valuate the most important ecosystem services in Swedish forests. Existing Swedish and Nordic research and statistics within this area are reviewed and used to develop a first framework for the valuation of ecosystem services in Swedish forests. We base our analysis on the CICES framework and the Cascade-model. Despite the rather long occurrence and use of the concept of ecosystem services, we do not yet have enough information on the status and economic value of services in Swedish forests. The value of the forest ecosystem services is at best an indication of the different multifunctional objectives that should be met in the management of the Swedish forests. The five most central ecosystem services in Swedish forests according to annual flow are timber and pulpwood, bioenergy, game, climate regulation and recreation and training, each estimated to have a monetary value of several billion SEK. The different ecosystem services in multipurpose forests interact with each other and may lead to conflicts between use and conservation. We identified a number of trade-offs and synergies between services focusing on the five above ecosystem services.
引用
收藏
页码:626 / 640
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessing Preferences for Cultural Ecosystem Services in the English Countryside Using Q Methodology
    Hubatova, Marie
    McGinlay, James
    Parsons, David J. J.
    Morris, Joe
    Graves, Anil R. R.
    LAND, 2023, 12 (02)
  • [32] Balancing trade-offs between ecosystem services in Germany's forests under climate change
    Gutsch, Martin
    Lasch-Born, Petra
    Kollas, Chris
    Suckow, Felicitas
    Reyer, Christopher P. O.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 13 (04):
  • [33] Modelling the influence of thinning intensity and frequency on the future provision of ecosystem services in Mediterranean mountain pine forests
    Simon, Diana-Cristina
    Ameztegui, Aitor
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2023, 142 (03) : 521 - 535
  • [34] Ecosystem Services: Origins, Contributions, Pitfalls, and Alternatives
    Lele, Sharachchandra
    Springate-Baginski, Oliver
    Lakerveld, Roan
    Deb, Debal
    Dash, Prasad
    CONSERVATION & SOCIETY, 2013, 11 (04) : 343 - 358
  • [35] Estimates of Values of Philippine Reefs' Ecosystem Services
    Tamayo, Natasha Charmaine A.
    Anticamara, Jonathan A.
    Acosta-Michlik, Lilibeth
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 146 : 633 - 644
  • [36] What are the research priorities for marine ecosystem services?
    Rivero, Susana
    Villasante, Sebastian
    MARINE POLICY, 2016, 66 : 104 - 113
  • [37] Implementation of the ecosystem services approach in Swedish municipal planning
    Schubert, Per
    Ekelund, Nils G. A.
    Beery, Thomas H.
    Wamsler, Christine
    Jonsson, K. Ingemar
    Roth, Andreas
    Stalhammar, Sanna
    Bramryd, Torleif
    Johansson, Michael
    Palo, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING, 2018, 20 (03) : 298 - 312
  • [38] ECOSYSTEM SERVICES AND DISSERVICES OF MANGROVE FORESTS AND SALT MARSHES
    Friess, Daniel A.
    Yando, Erik S.
    Alemu, Jahson B., I
    Wong, Lynn-Wei
    Soto, Sasha D.
    Bhatia, Natasha
    OCEANOGRAPHY AND MARINE BIOLOGY: AN ANNUAL REVIEW, VOL 58, 2020, 58 : 107 - 141
  • [39] Hyrcanian forests conservation based on ecosystem services approach
    Asadolahi, Zahra
    Salmanmahiny, Abdolrassoul
    Sakieh, Yousef
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2017, 76 (10)
  • [40] Going Upstream - How the Purpose of a Conceptual Framework for Ecosystem Services Determines Its Structure
    Heink, Ulrich
    Jax, Kurt
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 156 : 264 - 271