Ecosystem services in Swedish forests

被引:36
作者
Hansen, Karin [1 ]
Malmaeus, Mikael [1 ]
机构
[1] IVL Swedish Environm Res Inst, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Ecosystem services; Swedish forests; indicators; biophysical valuation; economic valuation; trade-offs; SOIL QUALITY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; MANAGEMENT; BIODIVERSITY; INDICATORS; VALUATION; BENEFITS; TOURISM; NORWAY;
D O I
10.1080/02827581.2016.1164888
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
We identify, describe qualitatively, quantify biophysically and, if possible, monetarily valuate the most important ecosystem services in Swedish forests. Existing Swedish and Nordic research and statistics within this area are reviewed and used to develop a first framework for the valuation of ecosystem services in Swedish forests. We base our analysis on the CICES framework and the Cascade-model. Despite the rather long occurrence and use of the concept of ecosystem services, we do not yet have enough information on the status and economic value of services in Swedish forests. The value of the forest ecosystem services is at best an indication of the different multifunctional objectives that should be met in the management of the Swedish forests. The five most central ecosystem services in Swedish forests according to annual flow are timber and pulpwood, bioenergy, game, climate regulation and recreation and training, each estimated to have a monetary value of several billion SEK. The different ecosystem services in multipurpose forests interact with each other and may lead to conflicts between use and conservation. We identified a number of trade-offs and synergies between services focusing on the five above ecosystem services.
引用
收藏
页码:626 / 640
页数:15
相关论文
共 94 条
[1]  
Akselsson C., 2007, Water, Air, and Soil Pollution: Focus, V7, P201, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S11267-006-9106-6, 10.1007/978-1-4020-5885-1_22, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-5885-1_22, 10.1007/s11267-006-9106-6]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, SOCIOECONOMIC IMPORT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well being synthesis
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, The UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Synthesis of the Key Findings
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1997, PREDICTING SOIL EROS
[6]  
[Anonymous], SWED STAT YB FOR 201
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2010, PROPOSAL COMMON INT
[8]   Revealing lay people's perceptions of forest biodiversity value components and their application in valuation method [J].
Bakhtiari, Fatemeh ;
Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl ;
Strange, Niels ;
Helles, Finn .
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2014, 1 :27-42
[9]   Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services [J].
Bennett, Elena M. ;
Peterson, Garry D. ;
Gordon, Line J. .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2009, 12 (12) :1394-1404
[10]  
Bischoff A., 2007, Friluftsliv Og Helse: En Kunnskapsoversikt