Pulmonary vasodilator therapies are of no benefit in pulmonary hypertension due to left heart disease: A meta-analysis

Background: Pulmonary hypertension complicating left heart disease (PH-LED) is the most common cause of PH. Off-label use of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) medications for PH-LED is prevalent, despite a lack of clinical data supporting their use. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Comprehensive search of all available literature to date identified ten randomised, placebo controlled trials comprising 439 treated (Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors: n = 206; guanylate cyclase stimulators: n = 132; endothelin receptor antagonists: n = 101) and 338 placebo patients. Random effects model was employed to assess outcomes in the treatment compared to the placebo control arm. Results: The risks of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and worsening heart failure were numerically higher in the treated compared to the control group, although not statistically (all-cause mortality: RR = 1.97, 95% CI: 0.64-6.05, p = 0.24; cardiovascular mortality: RR = 2.01, 95% CI: 039-10.34, p = 0.4; worsening heart failure: RR = 1.23, 95% CI: 0.68-2.25, p = 0.49). Conversely, right heart hemodynamics improved numerically in the treated group, also without being significant (mean pulmonary artery pressure: MWD = -5.13 mm Hg, 95% CI: -132-2.9, p = 0.21; pulmonary vascular resistance: MWD = -0.87 WU, 95% CI: -1.75-0.1, p = 0.053). Conclusions: The current meta-analysis demonstrated that there is no current evidence to support the widespread use of PAH therapy in PH-LHD. On the basis of a numerically increased risk of clinical harm, these agents should not be prescribed in this setting, unless further evidence of benefit arises in the future. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.